Learning Optimal Fair Scoring Systems for Multi-Class Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine Learning models are increasingly used for decision making, in particular in high-stakes applications such as credit scoring, medicine or recidivism prediction. However, there are growing concerns about these models with respect to their lack of interpretability and the undesirable biases they can generate or reproduce. While the concepts of interpretability and fairness have been extensively studied by the scientific community in recent years, few works have tackled the general multi-class classification problem under fairness constraints, and none of them proposes to generate fair and interpretable models for multi-class classification. In this paper, we use Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) techniques to produce inherently interpretable scoring systems under sparsity and fairness constraints, for the general multi-class classification setup. Our work generalizes the SLIM (Supersparse Linear Integer Models) framework that was proposed by Rudin and Ustun to learn optimal scoring systems for binary classification. The use of MILP techniques allows for an easy integration of diverse operational constraints (such as, but not restricted to, fairness or sparsity), but also for the building of certifiably optimal models (or sub-optimal models with bounded optimality gap).
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2023.
Builds on
16 of 39 references.
References · 16
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
- 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
- 2020Metrics for Multi-Class Classification: an Overviewcited by 140
- 2019Fairwashing: the risk of rationalizationcited by 81
- 2015Supersparse Linear Integer Models for Optimized Medical Scoring Systemscited by 76
- 2020Achieving Equalized Odds by Resampling Sensitive Attributescited by 42
- 2022Beyond Adult and COMPAS: Fairness in Multi-Class Predictioncited by 16
4 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 2.
8 papers.
- 2025A Generic Framework for Conformal Fairnesscited by 7
- 2024Unveiling the Impact of Local Homophily on GNN Fairness: In-Depth Analysis and New Benchmarkscited by 6
- 2024Evaluating Model Bias Requires Characterizing its Mistakescited by 3
- 2024Learning Social Fairness Preferences from Non-Expert Stakeholder Opinions in Kidney Placementcited by 1
- 2024Fair Decentralized Learningcited by 1
- 2024MISS: Multiclass Interpretable Scoring Systemscited by 0
- 2024Fairness Risks for Group-conditionally Missing Demographicscited by 0
- 2025Happiness as a Measure of Fairnesscited by 0
- 2025Happiness as a Measure of Fairness2 Nov 2025
- 2025A Generic Framework for Conformal Fairness22 May 2025
- 2024Unveiling the Impact of Local Homophily on GNN Fairness: In-Depth Analysis and New Benchmarks5 Oct 2024
- 2024Fair Decentralized Learning3 Oct 2024
- 2024Evaluating Model Bias Requires Characterizing its Mistakes15 Jul 2024
- 2024Learning Social Fairness Preferences from Non-Expert Stakeholder Opinions in Kidney Placement4 Apr 2024
- 2024Fairness Risks for Group-conditionally Missing Demographics20 Feb 2024
- 2024MISS: Multiclass Interpretable Scoring Systems10 Jan 2024