Certifiable Black-Box Attacks with Randomized Adversarial Examples: Breaking Defenses with Provable Confidence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Black-box adversarial attacks have demonstrated strong potential to compromise machine learning models by iteratively querying the target model or leveraging transferability from a local surrogate model. Recently, such attacks can be effectively mitigated by state-of-the-art (SOTA) defenses, e.g., detection via the pattern of sequential queries, or injecting noise into the model. To our best knowledge, we take the first step to study a new paradigm of black-box attacks with provable guarantees -- certifiable black-box attacks that can guarantee the attack success probability (ASP) of adversarial examples before querying over the target model. This new black-box attack unveils significant vulnerabilities of machine learning models, compared to traditional empirical black-box attacks, e.g., breaking strong SOTA defenses with provable confidence, constructing a space of (infinite) adversarial examples with high ASP, and the ASP of the generated adversarial examples is theoretically guaranteed without verification/queries over the target model. Specifically, we establish a novel theoretical foundation for ensuring the ASP of the black-box attack with randomized adversarial examples (AEs). Then, we propose several novel techniques to craft the randomized AEs while reducing the perturbation size for better imperceptibility. Finally, we have comprehensively evaluated the certifiable black-box attacks on the CIFAR10/100, ImageNet, and LibriSpeech datasets, while benchmarking with 16 SOTA black-box attacks, against various SOTA defenses in the domains of computer vision and speech recognition. Both theoretical and experimental results have validated the significance of the proposed attack. The code and all the benchmarks are available at urlhttps://github.com/datasec-lab/CertifiedAttack.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 77 of its 106 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2023.
Builds on
77 of 106 references.
References · 77
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
38 more
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
- 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
- 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
- 2017VoxCeleb: a large-scale speaker identification datasetcited by 714
- 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
- 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 656
- 2020ECAPA-TDNN: Emphasized Channel Attention, Propagation and Aggregation in TDNN Based Speaker Verificationcited by 606
- 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
- 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
- 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 499
- 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
- 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 462
- 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 459
- 2019Evading Defenses to Transferable Adversarial Examples by Translation-Invariant Attackscited by 440
- 2021SpeechBrain: A General-Purpose Speech Toolkitcited by 404
- 2017Mitigating Adversarial Effects Through Randomizationcited by 382
- 2018Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Modelscited by 362
- 2017Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoisercited by 329
- 2019HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attackcited by 328
- 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 268
- 2019Simple Black-box Adversarial Attackscited by 249
- 2017PixelDefend: Leveraging Generative Models to Understand and Defend against Adversarial Examplescited by 243
- 2018Sorting out Lipschitz function approximationcited by 211
- 2019Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbationscited by 182
- 2020A Self-supervised Approach for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 180
- 2018Stochastic Activation Pruning for Robust Adversarial Defensecited by 171
- 2017Towards Robust Neural Networks via Random Self-ensemblecited by 158
- 2020Randomized Smoothing of All Shapes and Sizescited by 146
- 2018Prior Convictions: Black-Box Adversarial Attacks with Bandits and Priorscited by 145
- 2018Query-Efficient Hard-label Black-box Attack:An Optimization-based Approachcited by 130
- 2022(Certified!!) Adversarial Robustness for Free!cited by 130
- 2018Parametric Noise Injection: Trainable Randomness to Improve Deep Neural Network Robustness against Adversarial Attackcited by 123
- 2019Sign-OPT: A Query-Efficient Hard-label Adversarial Attackcited by 118
- 2018Towards the first adversarially robust neural network model on MNISTcited by 104
- 2019NATTACK: Learning the Distributions of Adversarial Examples for an Improved Black-Box Attack on Deep Neural Networkscited by 94
50 most cited of 77 All 77 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2024Learning Robust and Privacy-Preserving Representations via Information Theorycited by 3
- 2025RDI: An adversarial robustness evaluation metric for deep neural networks based on model statistical featurescited by 1
- 2025PLRV-O: Advancing Differentially Private Deep Learning via Privacy Loss Random Variable Optimizationcited by 1
- 2026Low-Cost Hard-Label Adversarial Attack with Theoretical Foundationscited by 0
- 2026What the Eyes See, the LLMs Miss: Exploiting Human Perception for Adversarial Text Attackscited by 0
- 2026What the Eyes See, the LLMs Miss: Exploiting Human Perception for Adversarial Text Attacks8 Jun 2026
- 2026Low-Cost Hard-Label Adversarial Attack with Theoretical Foundations17 Jan 2026
- 2025PLRV-O: Advancing Differentially Private Deep Learning via Privacy Loss Random Variable Optimization8 Sep 2025
- 2025RDI: An adversarial robustness evaluation metric for deep neural networks based on model statistical features16 Apr 2025
- 2024Learning Robust and Privacy-Preserving Representations via Information Theory15 Dec 2024