mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cross-Domain Image Captioning with Discriminative Finetuning

arXiv 2304.01662 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2023cs.CV cs.AI cs.CLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural captioners are typically trained to mimic human-generated references without optimizing for any specific communication goal, leading to problems such as the generation of vague captions. In this paper, we show that fine-tuning an out-of-the-box neural captioner with a self-supervised discriminative communication objective helps to recover a plain, visually descriptive language that is more informative about image contents. Given a target image, the system must learn to produce a description that enables an out-of-the-box text-conditioned image retriever to identify such image among a set of candidates. We experiment with the popular ClipCap captioner, also replicating the main results with BLIP. In terms of similarity to ground-truth human descriptions, the captions emerging from discriminative finetuning lag slightly behind those generated by the non-finetuned model, when the latter is trained and tested on the same caption dataset. However, when the model is used without further tuning to generate captions for out-of-domain datasets, our discriminatively-finetuned captioner generates descriptions that resemble human references more than those produced by the same captioner without finetuning. We further show that, on the Conceptual Captions dataset, discriminatively finetuned captions are more helpful than either vanilla ClipCap captions or ground-truth captions for human annotators tasked with an image discrimination task.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2023.

Builds on

36 of 54 references.

References · 36

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  5. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  6. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  7. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  8. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  9. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
  10. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
  11. 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,423
  12. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,312
24 more
  1. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 968
  2. 2014Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generatorcited by 879
  3. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 824
  4. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 576
  5. 2021ClipCap: CLIP Prefix for Image Captioningcited by 559
  6. 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 547
  7. 2014Long-term Recurrent Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition and Descriptioncited by 484
  8. 2018nocaps: novel object captioning at scalecited by 444
  9. 2020A Survey of Evaluation Metrics Used for NLG Systemscited by 164
  10. 2021From Show to Tell: A Survey on Deep Learning-based Image Captioningcited by 138
  11. 2022Fine-grained Image Captioning with CLIP Rewardcited by 69
  12. 2018Discriminability objective for training descriptive captionscited by 67
  13. 2022LAVIS: A Library for Language-Vision Intelligencecited by 55
  14. 2017Contrastive Learning for Image Captioningcited by 54
  15. 2019EGG: a toolkit for research on Emergence of lanGuage in Gamescited by 42
  16. 2018Show, Tell and Discriminate: Image Captioning by Self-retrieval with Partially Labeled Datacited by 37
  17. 2023Tuning computer vision models with task rewardscited by 37
  18. 2016Automatic Description Generation from Images: A Survey of Models, Datasets, and Evaluation Measurescited by 36
  19. 2022Multimodal Knowledge Alignment with Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
  20. 2022Image Retrieval from Contextual Descriptionscited by 26
  21. 2017Show, Adapt and Tell: Adversarial Training of Cross-domain Image Captionercited by 21
  22. 2021Concadia: Towards Image-Based Text Generation with a Purposecited by 15
  23. 2022CaMEL: Mean Teacher Learning for Image Captioningcited by 14
  24. 2022Communication breakdown: On the low mutual intelligibility between human and neural captioningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 6; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: