mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Targeted Adversarial Attacks on Wind Power Forecasts

arXiv 2303.16633 ↗First posted 29 Mar 2023cs.LG cs.CRcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, researchers proposed a variety of deep learning models for wind power forecasting. These models predict the wind power generation of wind farms or entire regions more accurately than traditional machine learning algorithms or physical models. However, latest research has shown that deep learning models can often be manipulated by adversarial attacks. Since wind power forecasts are essential for the stability of modern power systems, it is important to protect them from this threat. In this work, we investigate the vulnerability of two different forecasting models to targeted, semi-targeted, and untargeted adversarial attacks. We consider a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network for predicting the power generation of individual wind farms and a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for forecasting the wind power generation throughout Germany. Moreover, we propose the Total Adversarial Robustness Score (TARS), an evaluation metric for quantifying the robustness of regression models to targeted and semi-targeted adversarial attacks. It assesses the impact of attacks on the model's performance, as well as the extent to which the attacker's goal was achieved, by assigning a score between 0 (very vulnerable) and 1 (very robust). In our experiments, the LSTM forecasting model was fairly robust and achieved a TARS value of over 0.78 for all adversarial attacks investigated. The CNN forecasting model only achieved TARS values below 0.10 when trained ordinarily, and was thus very vulnerable. Yet, its robustness could be significantly improved by adversarial training, which always resulted in a TARS above 0.46.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2023.

Builds on

27 of 54 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  7. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  8. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  9. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  10. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  11. 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 688
  12. 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 442
15 more
  1. 2018Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Trainingcited by 395
  2. 2019Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Images, Graphs and Text: A Reviewcited by 234
  3. 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
  4. 2019Adversarial Training Can Hurt Generalizationcited by 131
  5. 2021Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A surveycited by 127
  6. 2019Adversarial Attacks on Deep Neural Networks for Time Series Classificationcited by 53
  7. 2019Adversarial Attacks on Time Seriescited by 40
  8. 2021Untargeted, Targeted and Universal Adversarial Attacks and Defenses on Time Seriescited by 21
  9. 2019Exploiting Vulnerabilities of Load Forecasting Through Adversarial Attackscited by 18
  10. 2018Adversarial Attacks, Regression, and Numerical Stability Regularizationcited by 14
  11. 2020Adversarial Attacks on Multivariate Time Seriescited by 13
  12. 2021Evaluating the Cybersecurity Risk of Real World, Machine Learning Production Systemscited by 6
  13. 2019Attack on Grid Event Cause Analysis: An Adversarial Machine Learning Approachcited by 5
  14. 2020Fast Differentiable Clipping-Aware Normalization and Rescalingcited by 5
  15. 2021Estimating Solar and Wind Power Production using Computer Vision Deep Learning Techniques on Weather Mapscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

9 papers.