mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can Large Language Models assist in Hazard Analysis?

arXiv 2303.15473 ↗First posted 25 Mar 2023cs.HC cs.AI cs.SYcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GPT-3, have demonstrated remarkable natural language processing and generation capabilities and have been applied to a variety tasks, such as source code generation. This paper explores the potential of integrating LLMs in the hazard analysis for safety-critical systems, a process which we refer to as co-hazard analysis (CoHA). In CoHA, a human analyst interacts with an LLM via a context-aware chat session and uses the responses to support elicitation of possible hazard causes. In this experiment, we explore CoHA with three increasingly complex versions of a simple system, using Open AI's ChatGPT service. The quality of ChatGPT's responses were systematically assessed to determine the feasibility of CoHA given the current state of LLM technology. The results suggest that LLMs may be useful for supporting human analysts performing hazard analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2023.

Builds on

7 of 30 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  4. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
  5. 2022ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?cited by 88
  6. 2023ChatGPT is not all you need. A State of the Art Review of large Generative AI modelscited by 85
  7. 2022SafeDrones: Real-Time Reliability Evaluation of UAVs using Executable Digital Dependable Identitiescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

8 papers.