mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

HOOV: Hand Out-Of-View Tracking for Proprioceptive Interaction using Inertial Sensing

arXiv 2303.07016 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2023cs.HC cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current Virtual Reality systems are designed for interaction under visual control. Using built-in cameras, headsets track the user's hands or hand-held controllers while they are inside the field of view. Current systems thus ignore the user's interaction with off-screen content -- virtual objects that the user could quickly access through proprioception without requiring laborious head motions to bring them into focus. In this paper, we present HOOV, a wrist-worn sensing method that allows VR users to interact with objects outside their field of view. Based on the signals of a single wrist-worn inertial sensor, HOOV continuously estimates the user's hand position in 3-space to complement the headset's tracking as the hands leave the tracking range. Our novel data-driven method predicts hand positions and trajectories from just the continuous estimation of hand orientation, which by itself is stable based solely on inertial observations. Our inertial sensing simultaneously detects finger pinching to register off-screen selection events, confirms them using a haptic actuator inside our wrist device, and thus allows users to select, grab, and drop virtual content. We compared HOOV's performance with a camera-based optical motion capture system in two folds. In the first evaluation, participants interacted based on tracking information from the motion capture system to assess the accuracy of their proprioceptive input, whereas in the second, they interacted based on HOOV's real-time estimations. We found that HOOV's target-agnostic estimations had a mean tracking error of 7.7 cm, which allowed participants to reliably access virtual objects around their body without first bringing them into focus. We demonstrate several applications that leverage the larger input space HOOV opens up for quick proprioceptive interaction, and conclude by discussing the potential of our technique.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2023.

Builds on

14 of 72 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  4. 2018On the Continuity of Rotation Representations in Neural Networkscited by 1,186
  5. 2016Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation using Part Affinity Fieldscited by 1,061
  6. 2018DensePose: Dense Human Pose Estimation In The Wildcited by 573
  7. 2022Recurrent Memory Transformercited by 197
  8. 2022Physical Inertial Poser (PIP): Physics-aware Real-time Human Motion Tracking from Sparse Inertial Sensorscited by 144
  9. 2017Sparse Inertial Poser: Automatic 3D Human Pose Estimation from Sparse IMUscited by 108
  10. 2022AvatarPoser: Articulated Full-Body Pose Tracking from Sparse Motion Sensingcited by 107
  11. 2022QuestSim: Human Motion Tracking from Sparse Sensors with Simulated Avatarscited by 74
  12. 2016Seeing Invisible Poses: Estimating 3D Body Pose from Egocentric Videocited by 45
2 more
  1. 2016EgoCap: Egocentric Marker-less Motion Capture with Two Fisheye Cameras (Extended Abstract)cited by 24
  2. 2020A Mobile Robot Hand-Arm Teleoperation System by Vision and IMUcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

8 papers.