M-Tuning: Prompt Tuning with Mitigated Label Bias in Open-Set Scenarios
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In realistic open-set scenarios where labels of a part of testing data are totally unknown, when vision-language (VL) prompt learning methods encounter inputs related to unknown classes (i.e., not seen during training), they always predict them as one of the training classes. The exhibited label bias causes difficulty in open set recognition (OSR), in which an image should be correctly predicted as one of the known classes or the unknown one. To achieve this goal, we propose a vision-language prompt tuning method with mitigated label bias (M-Tuning). It introduces open words from the WordNet to extend the range of words forming the prompt texts from only closed-set label words to more, and thus prompts are tuned in a simulated open-set scenario. Besides, inspired by the observation that classifying directly on large datasets causes a much higher false positive rate than on small datasets, we propose a Combinatorial Tuning and Testing (CTT) strategy for improving performance. CTT decomposes M-Tuning on large datasets as multiple independent group-wise tuning on fewer classes, then makes accurate and comprehensive predictions by selecting the optimal sub-prompt. Finally, given the lack of VL-based OSR baselines in the literature, especially for prompt methods, we contribute new baselines for fair comparisons. Our method achieves the best performance on datasets with various scales, and extensive ablation studies also validate its effectiveness.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2023.
Builds on
58 of 84 references.
References · 58
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
- 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
38 more
- 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,612
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
- 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,427
- 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
- 2015LSUN: Construction of a Large-scale Image Dataset using Deep Learning with Humans in the Loopcited by 1,350
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
- 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
- 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 766
- 2019Large-Scale Long-Tailed Recognition in an Open Worldcited by 704
- 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 685
- 2015Towards Open Set Deep Networkscited by 533
- 2021Open-Set Recognition: a Good Closed-Set Classifier is All You Need?cited by 351
- 2022Prompt-aligned Gradient for Prompt Tuningcited by 339
- 2021Exploring the Limits of Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 283
- 2022What does a platypus look like? Generating customized prompts for zero-shot image classificationcited by 263
- 2022Prompt Distribution Learningcited by 235
- 2021MOS: Towards Scaling Out-of-distribution Detection for Large Semantic Spacecited by 233
- 2014Towards Open World Recognitioncited by 226
- 2021KnowPrompt: Knowledge-aware Prompt-tuning with Synergistic Optimization for Relation Extractioncited by 180
- 2021A Unified Survey on Anomaly, Novelty, Open-Set, and Out-of-Distribution Detection: Solutions and Future Challengescited by 154
- 2021Adversarial Reciprocal Points Learning for Open Set Recognitioncited by 153
- 2018Classification-Reconstruction Learning for Open-Set Recognitioncited by 146
- 2022Unified Vision and Language Prompt Learningcited by 145
- 2019C2AE: Class Conditioned Auto-Encoder for Open-set Recognitioncited by 142
- 2021OpenGAN: Open-Set Recognition via Open Data Generationcited by 135
- 2021Learning Placeholders for Open-Set Recognitioncited by 121
- 2020Learning Open Set Network with Discriminative Reciprocal Pointscited by 115
- 2020Hybrid Models for Open Set Recognitioncited by 109
- 2020Conditional Gaussian Distribution Learning for Open Set Recognitioncited by 104
- 2019E-BERT: Efficient-Yet-Effective Entity Embeddings for BERTcited by 96
- 2021Counterfactual Zero-Shot and Open-Set Visual Recognitioncited by 95
- 2022K-LITE: Learning Transferable Visual Models with External Knowledgecited by 79
- 2015The Extreme Value Machinecited by 78
- 2022LASP: Text-to-Text Optimization for Language-Aware Soft Prompting of Vision & Language Modelscited by 58
- 2022Pro-tuning: Unified Prompt Tuning for Vision Taskscited by 53
- 2022Dual Modality Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Pre-Trained Modelcited by 51
- 2022MAPL: Parameter-Efficient Adaptation of Unimodal Pre-Trained Models for Vision-Language Few-Shot Promptingcited by 41
- 2022Understanding and Mitigating Overfitting in Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 40
50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.