mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding the computational demands underlying visual reasoning

arXiv 2108.03603 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2021cs.CV cs.AIcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual understanding requires comprehending complex visual relations between objects within a scene. Here, we seek to characterize the computational demands for abstract visual reasoning. We do this by systematically assessing the ability of modern deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to learn to solve the "Synthetic Visual Reasoning Test" (SVRT) challenge, a collection of twenty-three visual reasoning problems. Our analysis reveals a novel taxonomy of visual reasoning tasks, which can be primarily explained by both the type of relations (same-different vs. spatial-relation judgments) and the number of relations used to compose the underlying rules. Prior cognitive neuroscience work suggests that attention plays a key role in humans' visual reasoning ability. To test this hypothesis, we extended the CNNs with spatial and feature-based attention mechanisms. In a second series of experiments, we evaluated the ability of these attention networks to learn to solve the SVRT challenge and found the resulting architectures to be much more efficient at solving the hardest of these visual reasoning tasks. Most importantly, the corresponding improvements on individual tasks partially explained our novel taxonomy. Overall, this work provides an granular computational account of visual reasoning and yields testable neuroscience predictions regarding the differential need for feature-based vs. spatial attention depending on the type of visual reasoning problem.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2021.

Builds on

29 of 68 references.

References · 29

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  5. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  6. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  7. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
  8. 2018CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Modulecited by 2,463
  9. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  10. 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,441
  11. 2019Stand-Alone Self-Attention in Vision Modelscited by 542
  12. 2019Attention Augmented Convolutional Networkscited by 363
17 more
  1. 2015Stacked Attention Networks for Image Question Answeringcited by 273
  2. 2020Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognitioncited by 273
  3. 2020On the Binding Problem in Artificial Neural Networkscited by 230
  4. 2016SCA-CNN: Spatial and Channel-wise Attention in Convolutional Networks for Image Captioningcited by 219
  5. 2018ResNet with one-neuron hidden layers is a Universal Approximatorcited by 78
  6. 2015Ask, Attend and Answer: Exploring Question-Guided Spatial Attention for Visual Question Answeringcited by 66
  7. 2020Attention over learned object embeddings enables complex visual reasoningcited by 59
  8. 2015Action Recognition using Visual Attentioncited by 49
  9. 2015ABC-CNN: An Attention Based Convolutional Neural Network for Visual Question Answeringcited by 23
  10. 2020Recurrent neural circuits for contour detectioncited by 23
  11. 2014Deep Networks with Internal Selective Attention through Feedback Connectionscited by 17
  12. 201625 years of CNNs: Can we compare to human abstraction capabilities?cited by 10
  13. 2021Solving the Same-Different Task with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 10
  14. 2020Evaluating the Progress of Deep Learning for Visual Relational Conceptscited by 9
  15. 2018Learning what and where to attendcited by 8
  16. 2016End-to-End Instance Segmentation with Recurrent Attentioncited by 4
  17. 2019Program synthesis performance constrained by non-linear spatial relations in Synthetic Visual Reasoning Testcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 6; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: