mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Inaccurate Label Distribution Learning

arXiv 2302.13000 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2023cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Label distribution learning (LDL) trains a model to predict the relevance of a set of labels (called label distribution (LD)) to an instance. The previous LDL methods all assumed the LDs of the training instances are accurate. However, annotating highly accurate LDs for training instances is time-consuming and very expensive, and in reality the collected LD is usually inaccurate and disturbed by annotating errors. For the first time, this paper investigates the problem of inaccurate LDL, i.e., developing an LDL model with noisy LDs. We assume that the noisy LD matrix is a linear combination of an ideal LD matrix and a sparse noise matrix. Consequently, the problem of inaccurate LDL becomes an inverse problem, where the objective is to recover the ideal LD and noise matrices from the noisy LDs. We hypothesize that the ideal LD matrix is low-rank due to the correlation of labels and utilize the local geometric structure of instances captured by a graph to assist in recovering the ideal LD. This is based on the premise that similar instances are likely to share the same LD. The proposed model is finally formulated as a graph-regularized low-rank and sparse decomposition problem and numerically solved by the alternating direction method of multipliers. Furthermore, a specialized objective function is utilized to induce a LD predictive model in LDL, taking into account the recovered label distributions. Extensive experiments conducted on multiple datasets from various real-world tasks effectively demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach. endabstract

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2023.

Builds on

11 of 67 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  3. 2014Label Distribution Learningcited by 122
  4. 2013Projection onto the probability simplex: An efficient algorithm with a simple proof, and an applicationcited by 65
  5. 2018SCUT-FBP5500: A Diverse Benchmark Dataset for Multi-Paradigm Facial Beauty Predictioncited by 33
  6. 2020Multi-View Spectral Clustering Tailored Tensor Low-Rank Representationcited by 21
  7. 2022Hybrid Routing Transformer for Zero-Shot Learningcited by 20
  8. 2015SCUT-FBP: A Benchmark Dataset for Facial Beauty Perceptioncited by 15
  9. 2022Towards Speaker Age Estimation with Label Distribution Learningcited by 13
  10. 2022ULTRA: Uncertainty-aware Label Distribution Learning for Breast Tumor Cellularity Assessmentcited by 7
  11. 2022Ensemble Clustering via Co-association Matrix Self-enhancementcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 6; 2026: 1.

10 papers.