mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dynamic Epsilon Scheduling: A Multi-Factor Adaptive Perturbation Budget for Adversarial Training

arXiv 2506.04263 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial training is among the most effective strategies for defending deep neural networks against adversarial examples. A key limitation of existing adversarial training approaches lies in their reliance on a fixed perturbation budget, which fails to account for instance-specific robustness characteristics. While prior works such as IAAT and MMA introduce instance-level adaptations, they often rely on heuristic or static approximations of data robustness. In this paper, we propose Dynamic Epsilon Scheduling (DES), a novel framework that adaptively adjusts the adversarial perturbation budget per instance and per training iteration. DES integrates three key factors: (1) the distance to the decision boundary approximated via gradient-based proxies, (2) prediction confidence derived from softmax entropy, and (3) model uncertainty estimated via Monte Carlo dropout. By combining these cues into a unified scheduling strategy, DES tailors the perturbation budget dynamically to guide more effective adversarial learning. Experimental results on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 show that our method consistently improves both adversarial robustness and standard accuracy compared to fixed-epsilon baselines and prior adaptive methods. Moreover, we provide theoretical insights into the stability and convergence of our scheduling policy. This work opens a new avenue for instance-aware, data-driven adversarial training methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2025.

Builds on

22 of 36 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  2. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  3. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
  4. 2024MACE: Mass Concept Erasure in Diffusion Modelscited by 307
  5. 2023TF-ICON: Diffusion-Based Training-Free Cross-Domain Image Compositioncited by 182
  6. 2024ODTrack: Online Dense Temporal Token Learning for Visual Trackingcited by 129
  7. 2024Robust Watermarking Using Generative Priors Against Image Editing: From Benchmarking to Advancescited by 110
  8. 2024EraseAnything: Enabling Concept Erasure in Rectified Flow Transformerscited by 95
  9. 2023Towards Unified Token Learning for Vision-Language Trackingcited by 62
  10. 2025Set You Straight: Auto-Steering Denoising Trajectories to Sidestep Unwanted Conceptscited by 62
  11. 2021Person Re-identification Method Based on Color Attack and Joint Defencecited by 56
  12. 2024RainMamba: Enhanced Locality Learning with State Space Models for Video Derainingcited by 56
10 more
  1. 2024Cross-Modality Perturbation Synergy Attack for Person Re-identificationcited by 45
  2. 2021Eliminate Deviation with Deviation for Data Augmentation and a General Multi-modal Data Learning Methodcited by 42
  3. 2024Exploring Color Invariance through Image-Level Ensemble Learningcited by 23
  4. 2024Beyond Augmentation: Empowering Model Robustness under Extreme Capture Environmentscited by 23
  5. 2024Phys4DGen: Physics-Compliant 4D Generation with Multi-Material Composition Perceptioncited by 23
  6. 2023Exploiting Multi-Label Correlation in Label Distribution Learningcited by 20
  7. 2024Beyond Dropout: Robust Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Local Feature Maskingcited by 19
  8. 2024Adversarial Learning for Neural PDE Solvers with Sparse Datacited by 16
  9. 2023Inaccurate Label Distribution Learningcited by 10
  10. 2025Label Distribution Learning with Biased Annotations by Learning Multi-Label Representationcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.