ULTRA: Uncertainty-aware Label Distribution Learning for Breast Tumor Cellularity Assessment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for breast cancer is a common treatment option in clinical practice. Tumor cellularity (TC), which represents the percentage of invasive tumors in the tumor bed, has been widely used to quantify the response of breast cancer to NAT. Therefore, automatic TC estimation is significant in clinical practice. However, existing state-of-the-art methods usually take it as a TC score regression problem, which ignores the ambiguity of TC labels caused by subjective assessment or multiple raters. In this paper, to efficiently leverage the label ambiguities, we proposed an Uncertainty-aware Label disTRibution leArning (ULTRA) framework for automatic TC estimation. The proposed ULTRA first converted the single-value TC labels to discrete label distributions, which effectively models the ambiguity among all possible TC labels. Furthermore, the network learned TC label distributions by minimizing the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the predicted and ground-truth TC label distributions, which better supervised the model to leverage the ambiguity of TC labels. Moreover, the ULTRA mimicked the multi-rater fusion process in clinical practice with a multi-branch feature fusion module to further explore the uncertainties of TC labels. We evaluated the ULTRA on the public BreastPathQ dataset. The experimental results demonstrate that the ULTRA outperformed the regression-based methods for a large margin and achieved state-of-the-art results. The code will be available from https://github.com/PerceptionComputingLab/ULTRA
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2022.
Builds on
5 of 24 references.
References · 5
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Label Distribution Learningcited by 124
- 2016Deep Label Distribution Learning with Label Ambiguitycited by 104
- 2020Uncertainty-aware Score Distribution Learning for Action Quality Assessmentcited by 80
- 2019Breast Tumor Cellularity Assessment using Deep Neural Networkscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2023A review of uncertainty quantification in medical image analysis: probabilistic and non-probabilistic methodscited by 39
- 2023Domain Generalization in Computational Pathology: Survey and Guidelinescited by 29
- 2025Uncertainty Quantification for Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Surveycited by 14
- 2023Inaccurate Label Distribution Learningcited by 10
- 2026Trustworthy Federated Label Distribution Learning under Annotation Quality Disparitycited by 1
- 2024Beyond Uncertainty Quantification: Learning Uncertainty for Trust-Informed Neural Network Decisions - A Case Study in COVID-19 Classificationcited by 0
- 2026PCA-Enhanced Probabilistic U-Net for Effective Ambiguous Medical Image Segmentationcited by 0
- 2026Trustworthy Federated Label Distribution Learning under Annotation Quality Disparity6 May 2026
- 2026PCA-Enhanced Probabilistic U-Net for Effective Ambiguous Medical Image Segmentation12 Mar 2026
- 2025Uncertainty Quantification for Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Survey4 May 2025
- 2024Beyond Uncertainty Quantification: Learning Uncertainty for Trust-Informed Neural Network Decisions - A Case Study in COVID-19 Classification19 Sep 2024
- 2023Domain Generalization in Computational Pathology: Survey and Guidelines30 Oct 2023
- 2023A review of uncertainty quantification in medical image analysis: probabilistic and non-probabilistic methods9 Oct 2023
- 2023Inaccurate Label Distribution Learning25 Feb 2023