mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Boosting Adversarial Transferability using Dynamic Cues

arXiv 2302.12252 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The transferability of adversarial perturbations between image models has been extensively studied. In this case, an attack is generated from a known surrogate eg, the ImageNet trained model, and transferred to change the decision of an unknown (black-box) model trained on an image dataset. However, attacks generated from image models do not capture the dynamic nature of a moving object or a changing scene due to a lack of temporal cues within image models. This leads to reduced transferability of adversarial attacks from representation-enriched image models such as Supervised Vision Transformers (ViTs), Self-supervised ViTs (eg, DINO), and Vision-language models (eg, CLIP) to black-box video models. In this work, we induce dynamic cues within the image models without sacrificing their original performance on images. To this end, we optimize temporal prompts through frozen image models to capture motion dynamics. Our temporal prompts are the result of a learnable transformation that allows optimizing for temporal gradients during an adversarial attack to fool the motion dynamics. Specifically, we introduce spatial (image) and temporal (video) cues within the same source model through task-specific prompts. Attacking such prompts maximizes the adversarial transferability from image-to-video and image-to-image models using the attacks designed for image models. Our attack results indicate that the attacker does not need specialized architectures, eg, divided space-time attention, 3D convolutions, or multi-view convolution networks for different data modalities. Image models are effective surrogates to optimize an adversarial attack to fool black-box models in a changing environment over time. Code is available at https://bit.ly/3Xd9gRQ

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2023.

Builds on

44 of 58 references.

References · 44

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  5. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  6. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  7. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  8. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  9. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  10. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  11. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  12. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
32 more
  1. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  2. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  3. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,894
  4. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
  5. 2021ViViT: A Video Vision Transformercited by 1,610
  6. 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,609
  7. 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,441
  8. 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,139
  9. 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,096
  10. 2017The "something something" video database for learning and evaluating visual common sensecited by 1,092
  11. 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
  12. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  13. 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 759
  14. 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 686
  15. 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 591
  16. 2015Multi-view Convolutional Neural Networks for 3D Shape Recognitioncited by 564
  17. 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 459
  18. 2022DeiT III: Revenge of the ViTcited by 417
  19. 2019Nesterov Accelerated Gradient and Scale Invariance for Adversarial Attackscited by 352
  20. 2021Knowledge distillation: A good teacher is patient and consistentcited by 255
  21. 2021Enhancing the Transferability of Adversarial Attacks through Variance Tuningcited by 242
  22. 2020A Self-supervised Approach for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 180
  23. 2017Generative Adversarial Perturbationscited by 153
  24. 2018Adversarial Reprogramming of Neural Networkscited by 115
  25. 2019Cross-Domain Transferability of Adversarial Perturbationscited by 92
  26. 2020On Success and Simplicity: A Second Look at Transferable Targeted Attackscited by 89
  27. 2021On Improving Adversarial Transferability of Vision Transformerscited by 70
  28. 2021On Generating Transferable Targeted Perturbationscited by 65
  29. 2022Beyond ImageNet Attack: Towards Crafting Adversarial Examples for Black-box Domainscited by 42
  30. 2022GAMA: Generative Adversarial Multi-Object Scene Attackscited by 13
  31. 2022Adversarial Pixel Restoration as a Pretext Task for Transferable Perturbationscited by 6
  32. 2022Guidance Through Surrogate: Towards a Generic Diagnostic Attackcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Harnessing the Computation Redundancy in ViTs to Boost Adversarial Transferability
  2. 2024Prompt-Driven Contrastive Learning for Transferable Adversarial Attacks
  3. 2024An Image Is Worth 1000 Lies: Adversarial Transferability across Prompts on Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025Boosting the Local Invariance for Better Adversarial Transferability
  5. 2026Improving Adversarial Transferability on Vision-Language Pre-training Models via Surrogate-Specific Bias Correction
  6. 2024Enhancing Cross-Prompt Transferability in Vision-Language Models through Contextual Injection of Target Tokens
  7. 2023Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025Revisiting CroPA: A Reproducibility Study and Enhancements for Cross-Prompt Adversarial Transferability in Vision-Language Models