Interpretable Spectrum Transformation Attacks to Speaker Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The success of adversarial attacks to speaker recognition is mainly in white-box scenarios. When applying the adversarial voices that are generated by attacking white-box surrogate models to black-box victim models, i.e. textittransfer-based black-box attacks, the transferability of the adversarial voices is not only far from satisfactory, but also lacks interpretable basis. To address these issues, in this paper, we propose a general framework, named spectral transformation attack based on modified discrete cosine transform (STA-MDCT), to improve the transferability of the adversarial voices to a black-box victim model. Specifically, we first apply MDCT to the input voice. Then, we slightly modify the energy of different frequency bands for capturing the salient regions of the adversarial noise in the time-frequency domain that are critical to a successful attack. Unlike existing approaches that operate voices in the time domain, the proposed framework operates voices in the time-frequency domain, which improves the interpretability, transferability, and imperceptibility of the attack. Moreover, it can be implemented with any gradient-based attackers. To utilize the advantage of model ensembling, we not only implement STA-MDCT with a single white-box surrogate model, but also with an ensemble of surrogate models. Finally, we visualize the saliency maps of adversarial voices by the class activation maps (CAM), which offers an interpretable basis to transfer-based attacks in speaker recognition for the first time. Extensive comparison results with five representative attackers show that the CAM visualization clearly explains the effectiveness of STA-MDCT, and the weaknesses of the comparison methods; the proposed method outperforms the comparison methods by a large margin.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2023.
Builds on
41 of 65 references.
References · 41
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
- 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
- 2018VoxCeleb2: Deep Speaker Recognitioncited by 862
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
- 2017VoxCeleb: a large-scale speaker identification datasetcited by 714
- 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 656
29 more
- 2020ECAPA-TDNN: Emphasized Channel Attention, Propagation and Aggregation in TDNN Based Speaker Verificationcited by 606
- 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
- 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 499
- 2019Evading Defenses to Transferable Adversarial Examples by Translation-Invariant Attackscited by 440
- 2019Hidden Trigger Backdoor Attackscited by 359
- 2019Nesterov Accelerated Gradient and Scale Invariance for Adversarial Attackscited by 352
- 2019HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attackcited by 328
- 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
- 2020End-to-end anti-spoofing with RawNet2cited by 160
- 2022Frequency Domain Model Augmentation for Adversarial Attackcited by 128
- 2020In defence of metric learning for speaker recognitioncited by 123
- 2019Who is Real Bob? Adversarial Attacks on Speaker Recognition Systemscited by 66
- 2020Backdoor Attack against Speaker Verificationcited by 62
- 2020Speaker Recognition Based on Deep Learning: An Overviewcited by 59
- 2021Meta Gradient Adversarial Attackcited by 55
- 2022Pushing the limits of raw waveform speaker recognitioncited by 49
- 2018Fooling End-to-end Speaker Verification by Adversarial Examplescited by 39
- 2022Towards Understanding and Boosting Adversarial Transferability from a Distribution Perspectivecited by 36
- 2020Enabling Fast and Universal Audio Adversarial Attack Using Generative Modelcited by 31
- 2019Large Margin Softmax Loss for Speaker Verificationcited by 26
- 2019Adversarial Attacks on GMM i-vector based Speaker Verification Systemscited by 23
- 2020Adversarial Attack and Defense Strategies for Deep Speaker Recognition Systemscited by 21
- 2020The ins and outs of speaker recognition: lessons from VoxSRC 2020cited by 21
- 2020The Attacker's Perspective on Automatic Speaker Verification: An Overviewcited by 19
- 2020Universal Adversarial Perturbations Generative Network for Speaker Recognitioncited by 13
- 2022Diversified Adversarial Attacks based on Conjugate Gradient Methodcited by 11
- 2022BATT: Backdoor Attack with Transformation-based Triggerscited by 9
- 2022Reliable Visualization for Deep Speaker Recognitioncited by 2
- 2022Symmetric Saliency-based Adversarial Attack To Speaker Identificationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.