mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sum-of-Squares Lower Bounds for Sparse PCA

arXiv 1507.06370 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2015cs.LG cs.CC math.STcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper establishes a statistical versus computational trade-off for solving a basic high-dimensional machine learning problem via a basic convex relaxation method. Specifically, we consider the em Sparse Principal Component Analysis (Sparse PCA) problem, and the family of em Sum-of-Squares (SoS, aka Lasserre/Parillo) convex relaxations. It was well known that in large dimension p, a planted k-sparse unit vector can be em in principle detected using only n ≈ klog p (Gaussian or Bernoulli) samples, but all em efficient (polynomial time) algorithms known require n ≈ k2 samples. It was also known that this quadratic gap cannot be improved by the the most basic em semi-definite (SDP, aka spectral) relaxation, equivalent to a degree-2 SoS algorithms. Here we prove that also degree-4 SoS algorithms cannot improve this quadratic gap. This average-case lower bound adds to the small collection of hardness results in machine learning for this powerful family of convex relaxation algorithms. Moreover, our design of moments (or "pseudo-expectations") for this lower bound is quite different than previous lower bounds. Establishing lower bounds for higher degree SoS algorithms for remains a challenging problem.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 2.

10 papers.