The Average-Case Time Complexity of Certifying the Restricted Isometry Property
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In compressed sensing, the restricted isometry property (RIP) on M × N sensing matrices (where M < N) guarantees efficient reconstruction of sparse vectors. A matrix has the (s,δ)-mathsfRIP property if behaves as a δ-approximate isometry on s-sparse vectors. It is well known that an M× N matrix with i.i.d. N(0,1/M) entries is (s,δ)-mathsfRIP with high probability as long as slesssim δ2 M/log N. On the other hand, most prior works aiming to deterministically construct (s,δ)-mathsfRIP matrices have failed when s gg √M. An alternative way to find an RIP matrix could be to draw a random gaussian matrix and certify that it is indeed RIP. However, there is evidence that this certification task is computationally hard when s gg √M, both in the worst case and the average case. In this paper, we investigate the exact average-case time complexity of certifying the RIP property for M× N matrices with i.i.d. N(0,1/M) entries, in the "possible but hard" regime √M ll slesssim M/log N. Based on analysis of the low-degree likelihood ratio, we give rigorous evidence that subexponential runtime NtildeOmega(s2/M) is required, demonstrating a smooth tradeoff between the maximum tolerated sparsity and the required computational power. This lower bound is essentially tight, matching the runtime of an existing algorithm due to Koiran and Zouzias. Our hardness result allows δ to take any constant value in (0,1), which captures the relevant regime for compressed sensing. This improves upon the existing average-case hardness result of Wang, Berthet, and Plan, which is limited to δ = o(1).
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2021Optimal Spectral Recovery of a Planted Vector in a Subspacecited by 21
- 2022Tensor-on-Tensor Regression: Riemannian Optimization, Over-parameterization, Statistical-computational Gap, and Their Interplaycited by 15
- 2021Beyond Independent Measurements: General Compressed Sensing with GNN Applicationcited by 5
- 2022On the well-spread property and its relation to linear regressioncited by 4
- 2024Computational-Statistical Gaps for Improper Learning in Sparse Linear Regressioncited by 4
- 2024Lasso with Latents: Efficient Estimation, Covariate Rescaling, and Computational-Statistical Gapscited by 4
- 2023Sparse PCA Beyond Covariance Thresholdingcited by 2
- 2026Low-Degree Method Fails to Predict Robust Subspace Recoverycited by 0
- 2026Efficiently Learning Drifting Halfspaces with Massart Noisecited by 0
- 2026Efficiently Learning Drifting Halfspaces with Massart Noise9 Jun 2026
- 2026Low-Degree Method Fails to Predict Robust Subspace Recovery3 Mar 2026
- 2024Lasso with Latents: Efficient Estimation, Covariate Rescaling, and Computational-Statistical Gaps23 Feb 2024
- 2024Computational-Statistical Gaps for Improper Learning in Sparse Linear Regression21 Feb 2024
- 2023Sparse PCA Beyond Covariance Thresholding20 Feb 2023
- 2022Tensor-on-Tensor Regression: Riemannian Optimization, Over-parameterization, Statistical-computational Gap, and Their Interplay17 Jun 2022
- 2022On the well-spread property and its relation to linear regression16 Jun 2022
- 2021Beyond Independent Measurements: General Compressed Sensing with GNN Application30 Oct 2021
- 2021Optimal Spectral Recovery of a Planted Vector in a Subspace31 May 2021