mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating and Improving the Coreference Capabilities of Machine Translation Models

arXiv 2302.08464 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine translation (MT) requires a wide range of linguistic capabilities, which current end-to-end models are expected to learn implicitly by observing aligned sentences in bilingual corpora. In this work, we ask: How well do MT models learn coreference resolution from implicit signal? To answer this question, we develop an evaluation methodology that derives coreference clusters from MT output and evaluates them without requiring annotations in the target language. We further evaluate several prominent open-source and commercial MT systems, translating from English to six target languages, and compare them to state-of-the-art coreference resolvers on three challenging benchmarks. Our results show that the monolingual resolvers greatly outperform MT models. Motivated by this result, we experiment with different methods for incorporating the output of coreference resolution models in MT, showing improvement over strong baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2023.

Builds on

27 of 44 references.

References · 27

  1. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  2. 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,028
  3. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  4. 2019SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spanscited by 832
  5. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
  6. 2020Beyond English-Centric Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 559
  7. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 438
  8. 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
  9. 2018AllenNLP: A Deep Semantic Natural Language Processing Platformcited by 347
  10. 2019Abductive Commonsense Reasoningcited by 300
  11. 2020Multilingual Translation with Extensible Multilingual Pretraining and Finetuningcited by 287
  12. 2019Cosmos QA: Machine Reading Comprehension with Contextual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 281
15 more
  1. 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 247
  2. 2018Marian: Fast Neural Machine Translation in C++cited by 202
  3. 2019WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at Scalecited by 194
  4. 2019CCMatrix: Mining Billions of High-Quality Parallel Sentences on the WEBcited by 177
  5. 2019Getting Gender Right in Neural Machine Translationcited by 98
  6. 2017Evaluating Discourse Phenomena in Neural Machine Translationcited by 87
  7. 2020Reducing Gender Bias in Neural Machine Translation as a Domain Adaptation Problemcited by 86
  8. 2021Collecting a Large-Scale Gender Bias Dataset for Coreference Resolution and Machine Translationcited by 62
  9. 2021Coreference Resolution without Span Representationscited by 45
  10. 2016How Grammatical is Character-level Neural Machine Translation? Assessing MT Quality with Contrastive Translation Pairscited by 39
  11. 2019Filling Gender & Number Gaps in Neural Machine Translation with Black-box Context Injectioncited by 27
  12. 2022LingMess: Linguistically Informed Multi Expert Scorers for Coreference Resolutioncited by 26
  13. 2018Automatic Reference-Based Evaluation of Pronoun Translation Misses the Pointcited by 6
  14. 2020Scalable Cross Lingual Pivots to Model Pronoun Gender for Translationcited by 4
  15. 2019Yall should read this! Identifying Plurality in Second-Person Personal Pronouns in English Textscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.