mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

New Insights on Relieving Task-Recency Bias for Online Class Incremental Learning

arXiv 2302.08243 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2023cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To imitate the ability of keeping learning of human, continual learning which can learn from a never-ending data stream has attracted more interests recently. In all settings, the online class incremental learning (OCIL), where incoming samples from data stream can be used only once, is more challenging and can be encountered more frequently in real world. Actually, all continual learning models face a stability-plasticity dilemma, where the stability means the ability to preserve old knowledge while the plasticity denotes the ability to incorporate new knowledge. Although replay-based methods have shown exceptional promise, most of them concentrate on the strategy for updating and retrieving memory to keep stability at the expense of plasticity. To strike a preferable trade-off between stability and plasticity, we propose an Adaptive Focus Shifting algorithm (AFS), which dynamically adjusts focus to ambiguous samples and non-target logits in model learning. Through a deep analysis of the task-recency bias caused by class imbalance, we propose a revised focal loss to mainly keep stability. RtBy utilizing a new weight function, the revised focal loss will pay more attention to current ambiguous samples, which are the potentially valuable samples to make model progress quickly. To promote plasticity, we introduce a virtual knowledge distillation. By designing a virtual teacher, it assigns more attention to non-target classes, which can surmount overconfidence and encourage model to focus on inter-class information. Extensive experiments on three popular datasets for OCIL have shown the effectiveness of AFS. The code will be available at urlhttps://github.com/czjghost/AFS.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2023.

Builds on

43 of 67 references.

References · 43

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  4. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  5. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
  6. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
  7. 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,871
  8. 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,094
  9. 2018Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEMcited by 1,044
  10. 2020Dark Experience for General Continual Learning: a Strong, Simple Baselinecited by 895
  11. 2017PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruningcited by 882
  12. 2018Riemannian Walk for Incremental Learning: Understanding Forgetting and Intransigencecited by 734
31 more
  1. 2019Large Scale Incremental Learningcited by 727
  2. 2019Large-Scale Long-Tailed Recognition in an Open Worldcited by 704
  3. 2017Lifelong Learning with Dynamically Expandable Networkscited by 689
  4. 2019Three scenarios for continual learningcited by 610
  5. 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 602
  6. 2018End-to-End Incremental Learningcited by 596
  7. 2019Gradient based sample selection for online continual learningcited by 568
  8. 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 547
  9. 2020Class-incremental learning: survey and performance evaluation on image classificationcited by 446
  10. 2018Bag of Tricks for Image Classification with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 430
  11. 2019Online Continual Learning with Maximally Interfered Retrievalcited by 376
  12. 2020Equalization Loss for Long-Tailed Object Recognitioncited by 285
  13. 2019Maintaining Discrimination and Fairness in Class Incremental Learningcited by 281
  14. 2021Online Continual Learning in Image Classification: An Empirical Surveycited by 242
  15. 2020Semantic Drift Compensation for Class-Incremental Learningcited by 241
  16. 2021New Insights on Reducing Abrupt Representation Change in Online Continual Learningcited by 215
  17. 2023Class-Incremental Learning: A Surveycited by 209
  18. 2021Supervised Contrastive Replay: Revisiting the Nearest Class Mean Classifier in Online Class-Incremental Continual Learningcited by 140
  19. 2020A Neural Dirichlet Process Mixture Model for Task-Free Continual Learningcited by 133
  20. 2020SS-IL: Separated Softmax for Incremental Learningcited by 126
  21. 2021Online Coreset Selection for Rehearsal-based Continual Learningcited by 114
  22. 2020iTAML: An Incremental Task-Agnostic Meta-learning Approachcited by 90
  23. 2020Incremental Learning In Online Scenariocited by 71
  24. 2020CPR: Classifier-Projection Regularization for Continual Learningcited by 62
  25. 2022Equalized Focal Loss for Dense Long-Tailed Object Detectioncited by 46
  26. 2020Meta-Consolidation for Continual Learningcited by 40
  27. 2018Tree-CNN: A Hierarchical Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Incremental Learningcited by 34
  28. 2019Regularization Shortcomings for Continual Learningcited by 32
  29. 2023Task-Aware Information Routing from Common Representation Space in Lifelong Learningcited by 22
  30. 2022Consistency is the key to further mitigating catastrophic forgetting in continual learningcited by 14
  31. 2020Batch-level Experience Replay with Review for Continual Learningcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.