mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sparse-SignSGD with Majority Vote for Communication-Efficient Distributed Learning

arXiv 2302.07475 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2023cs.LG cs.DC math.OCcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The training efficiency of complex deep learning models can be significantly improved through the use of distributed optimization. However, this process is often hindered by a large amount of communication cost between workers and a parameter server during iterations. To address this bottleneck, in this paper, we present a new communication-efficient algorithm that offers the synergistic benefits of both sparsification and sign quantization, called sf S3GD-MV. The workers in sf S3GD-MV select the top-K magnitude components of their local gradient vector and only send the signs of these components to the server. The server then aggregates the signs and returns the results via a majority vote rule. Our analysis shows that, under certain mild conditions, sf S3GD-MV can converge at the same rate as signSGD while significantly reducing communication costs, if the sparsification parameter K is properly chosen based on the number of workers and the size of the deep learning model. Experimental results using both independent and identically distributed (IID) and non-IID datasets demonstrate that the sf S3GD-MV attains higher accuracy than signSGD, significantly reducing communication costs. These findings highlight the potential of sf S3GD-MV as a promising solution for communication-efficient distributed optimization in deep learning.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2023.

Builds on

25 of 41 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,265
  3. 2018Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Littlecited by 595
  4. 2018signSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problemscited by 561
  5. 2017Deep Gradient Compression: Reducing the Communication Bandwidth for Distributed Trainingcited by 471
  6. 2019Robust and Communication-Efficient Federated Learning from Non-IID Datacited by 415
  7. 2018Sparsified SGD with Memorycited by 373
  8. 2019Error Feedback Fixes SignSGD and other Gradient Compression Schemescited by 306
  9. 2017TernGrad: Ternary Gradients to Reduce Communication in Distributed Deep Learningcited by 253
  10. 2017Sparse Communication for Distributed Gradient Descentcited by 243
  11. 2018The Convergence of Sparsified Gradient Methodscited by 228
  12. 2017Gradient Sparsification for Communication-Efficient Distributed Optimizationcited by 199
13 more
  1. 2019Qsparse-local-SGD: Distributed SGD with Quantization, Sparsification, and Local Computationscited by 179
  2. 2020FetchSGD: Communication-Efficient Federated Learning with Sketchingcited by 178
  3. 2017Revisiting Distributed Synchronous SGDcited by 142
  4. 2019Distributed Learning with Compressed Gradient Differencescited by 110
  5. 2020UVeQFed: Universal Vector Quantization for Federated Learningcited by 103
  6. 2020Adaptive Gradient Sparsification for Efficient Federated Learning: An Online Learning Approachcited by 80
  7. 2021MARINA: Faster Non-Convex Distributed Learning with Compressioncited by 77
  8. 2021Adaptive Quantization of Model Updates for Communication-Efficient Federated Learningcited by 60
  9. 2019Understanding Top-k Sparsification in Distributed Deep Learningcited by 56
  10. 2019Communication-Efficient Distributed Blockwise Momentum SGD with Error-Feedbackcited by 49
  11. 2018SparCML: High-Performance Sparse Communication for Machine Learningcited by 34
  12. 2022Near-Optimal Sparse Allreduce for Distributed Deep Learningcited by 23
  13. 2021Communication Efficient Federated Learning with Adaptive Quantizationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.