mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fair Spatial Indexing: A paradigm for Group Spatial Fairness

arXiv 2302.02306 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) is playing an increasing role in decision-making tasks that directly affect individuals, e.g., loan approvals, or job applicant screening. Significant concerns arise that, without special provisions, individuals from under-privileged backgrounds may not get equitable access to services and opportunities. Existing research studies fairness with respect to protected attributes such as gender, race or income, but the impact of location data on fairness has been largely overlooked. With the widespread adoption of mobile apps, geospatial attributes are increasingly used in ML, and their potential to introduce unfair bias is significant, given their high correlation with protected attributes. We propose techniques to mitigate location bias in machine learning. Specifically, we consider the issue of miscalibration when dealing with geospatial attributes. We focus on spatial group fairness and we propose a spatial indexing algorithm that accounts for fairness. Our KD-tree inspired approach significantly improves fairness while maintaining high learning accuracy, as shown by extensive experimental results on real data.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2023.

Builds on

14 of 46 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  3. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  4. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  5. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  6. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  7. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
  8. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  9. 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
  10. 2020Individual Fairness for k-Clusteringcited by 56
  11. 2020In Pursuit of Interpretable, Fair and Accurate Machine Learning for Criminal Recidivism Predictioncited by 42
  12. 2020A Notion of Individual Fairness for Clusteringcited by 20
2 more
  1. 2022Context matters for fairness -- a case study on the effect of spatial distribution shiftscited by 3
  2. 2021Equity and Privacy: More Than Just a Tradeoffcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.