mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Holistic Survey of Privacy and Fairness in Machine Learning

arXiv 2307.15838 ↗First posted 28 Jul 2023cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Privacy and fairness are two crucial pillars of responsible Artificial Intelligence (AI) and trustworthy Machine Learning (ML). Each objective has been independently studied in the literature with the aim of reducing utility loss in achieving them. Despite the significant interest attracted from both academia and industry, there remains an immediate demand for more in-depth research to unravel how these two objectives can be simultaneously integrated into ML models. As opposed to well-accepted trade-offs, i.e., privacy-utility and fairness-utility, the interrelation between privacy and fairness is not well-understood. While some works suggest a trade-off between the two objective functions, there are others that demonstrate the alignment of these functions in certain scenarios. To fill this research gap, we provide a thorough review of privacy and fairness in ML, including supervised, unsupervised, semi-supervised, and reinforcement learning. After examining and consolidating the literature on both objectives, we present a holistic survey on the impact of privacy on fairness, the impact of fairness on privacy, existing architectures, their interaction in application domains, and algorithms that aim to achieve both objectives while minimizing the utility sacrificed. Finally, we identify research challenges in achieving privacy and fairness concurrently in ML, particularly focusing on large language models.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 70 of its 250 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2023.

Builds on

70 of 250 references.

References · 70

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  4. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  5. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  6. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
  7. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  8. 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 451
  9. 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 375
  10. 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
  11. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  12. 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
38 more
  1. 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 221
  2. 2019A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cyclecited by 192
  3. 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
  4. 2017A Survey on Homomorphic Encryption Schemes: Theory and Implementationcited by 154
  5. 2017A Convex Framework for Fair Regressioncited by 147
  6. 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145
  7. 2021Towards a Unified Framework for Fair and Stable Graph Representation Learningcited by 128
  8. 2019Compositional Fairness Constraints for Graph Embeddingscited by 126
  9. 2021FairFed: Enabling Group Fairness in Federated Learningcited by 114
  10. 2020FairBatch: Batch Selection for Model Fairnesscited by 99
  11. 2020Unifying Graph Convolutional Neural Networks and Label Propagationcited by 98
  12. 2019Robust Anomaly Detection and Backdoor Attack Detection Via Differential Privacycited by 93
  13. 2018A General Approach to Adding Differential Privacy to Iterative Training Procedurescited by 84
  14. 2020When Machine Learning Meets Privacy: A Survey and Outlookcited by 67
  15. 2020Differentially Private Representation for NLP: Formal Guarantee and An Empirical Study on Privacy and Fairnesscited by 66
  16. 2018Online Learning with an Unknown Fairness Metriccited by 61
  17. 2021Post-processing for Individual Fairnesscited by 61
  18. 2021Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning: Methods, Challenges and Directionscited by 58
  19. 2022AlexaTM 20B: Few-Shot Learning Using a Large-Scale Multilingual Seq2Seq Modelcited by 57
  20. 2019Algorithms for Fairness in Sequential Decision Makingcited by 53
  21. 2022Differential Privacy and Fairness in Decisions and Learning Tasks: A Surveycited by 47
  22. 2017Calibrated Fairness in Banditscited by 42
  23. 2019Fair Contextual Multi-Armed Bandits: Theory and Experimentscited by 41
  24. 2019Differentially Private Meta-Learningcited by 40
  25. 2020Probabilistic Fair Clusteringcited by 28
  26. 2021The Rich Get Richer: Disparate Impact of Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 28
  27. 2022A Critical Review on the Use (and Misuse) of Differential Privacy in Machine Learningcited by 27
  28. 2017Penalizing Unfairness in Binary Classificationcited by 25
  29. 2020Fair Hierarchical Clusteringcited by 25
  30. 2021Fair Clustering Under a Bounded Costcited by 21
  31. 2020A Notion of Individual Fairness for Clusteringcited by 20
  32. 2022A Survey on Fairness for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 20
  33. 2021Investigating Trade-offs in Utility, Fairness and Differential Privacy in Neural Networkscited by 17
  34. 2021Modeling Techniques for Machine Learning Fairness: A Surveycited by 17
  35. 2022Stochastic Differentially Private and Fair Learningcited by 16
  36. 2023Unraveling Privacy Risks of Individual Fairness in Graph Neural Networkscited by 16
  37. 2015Optimality of the Laplace Mechanism in Differential Privacycited by 15
  38. 2018The Bounded Laplace Mechanism in Differential Privacycited by 13

50 most cited of 70 All 70 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.