Fourier Sensitivity and Regularization of Computer Vision Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent work has empirically shown that deep neural networks latch on to the Fourier statistics of training data and show increased sensitivity to Fourier-basis directions in the input. Understanding and modifying this Fourier-sensitivity of computer vision models may help improve their robustness. Hence, in this paper we study the frequency sensitivity characteristics of deep neural networks using a principled approach. We first propose a basis trick, proving that unitary transformations of the input-gradient of a function can be used to compute its gradient in the basis induced by the transformation. Using this result, we propose a general measure of any differentiable model's Fourier-sensitivity using the unitary Fourier-transform of its input-gradient. When applied to deep neural networks, we find that computer vision models are consistently sensitive to particular frequencies dependent on the dataset, training method and architecture. Based on this measure, we further propose a Fourier-regularization framework to modify the Fourier-sensitivities and frequency bias of models. Using our proposed regularizer-family, we demonstrate that deep neural networks obtain improved classification accuracy on robustness evaluations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2023.
Builds on
29 of 44 references.
References · 29
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
- 2020Designing Network Design Spacescited by 960
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
17 more
- 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 769
- 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
- 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
- 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
- 2017Sobolev Training for Neural Networkscited by 143
- 2019Robust Learning with Jacobian Regularizationcited by 129
- 2019MixConv: Mixed Depthwise Convolutional Kernelscited by 108
- 2018Improving DNN Robustness to Adversarial Attacks using Jacobian Regularizationcited by 88
- 2017Measuring the tendency of CNNs to Learn Surface Statistical Regularitiescited by 87
- 2019Interpreting Adversarially Trained Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 75
- 2019On the Effectiveness of Low Frequency Perturbationscited by 56
- 2019Jacobian Adversarially Regularized Networks for Robustnesscited by 40
- 2021On Measuring and Controlling the Spectral Bias of the Deep Image Priorcited by 36
- 2021Improving robustness against common corruptions with frequency biased modelscited by 34
- 2018On the Structural Sensitivity of Deep Convolutional Networks to the Directions of Fourier Basis Functionscited by 32
- 2021Does enhanced shape bias improve neural network robustness to common corruptions?cited by 32
- 2020Hold me tight! Influence of discriminative features on deep network boundariescited by 31
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.