PAC-Bayesian Soft Actor-Critic Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Actor-critic algorithms address the dual goals of reinforcement learning (RL), policy evaluation and improvement via two separate function approximators. The practicality of this approach comes at the expense of training instability, caused mainly by the destructive effect of the approximation errors of the critic on the actor. We tackle this bottleneck by employing an existing Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) Bayesian bound for the first time as the critic training objective of the Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) algorithm. We further demonstrate that online learning performance improves significantly when a stochastic actor explores multiple futures by critic-guided random search. We observe our resulting algorithm to compare favorably against the state-of-the-art SAC implementation on multiple classical control and locomotion tasks in terms of both sample efficiency and regret.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2023.
Builds on
33 of 59 references.
References · 33
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
- 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,598
- 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,221
21 more
- 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Modelscited by 748
- 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
- 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 659
- 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 527
- 2021User-friendly introduction to PAC-Bayes boundscited by 234
- 2015Maximum Entropy Deep Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 173
- 2017Neural Episodic Controlcited by 148
- 2019A Primer on PAC-Bayesian Learningcited by 130
- 2021State Entropy Maximization with Random Encoders for Efficient Explorationcited by 107
- 2019Network Randomization: A Simple Technique for Generalization in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 102
- 2019Better Exploration with Optimistic Actor-Criticcited by 88
- 2021Tactical Optimism and Pessimism for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 55
- 2021Robust Generalised Bayesian Inference for Intractable Likelihoodscited by 53
- 2021MADE: Exploration via Maximizing Deviation from Explored Regionscited by 40
- 2020Second Order PAC-Bayesian Bounds for the Weighted Majority Votecited by 34
- 2020Softmax Deep Double Deterministic Policy Gradientscited by 31
- 2021Generalization Bounds for Meta-Learning via PAC-Bayes and Uniform Stabilitycited by 29
- 2018Learning Gaussian Processes by Minimizing PAC-Bayesian Generalization Boundscited by 24
- 2020Diversity Actor-Critic: Sample-Aware Entropy Regularization for Sample-Efficient Explorationcited by 20
- 2020Probably Approximately Correct Vision-Based Planning using Motion Primitivescited by 16
- 2020Learning Partially Known Stochastic Dynamics with Empirical PAC Bayescited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Deep Actor-Critics with Tight Risk Certificates26 May 2025
- 2024Deep Exploration with PAC-Bayes5 Feb 2024
- 2023Bayesian inference for data-efficient, explainable, and safe robotic motion planning: A review16 Jul 2023