mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Connecting metrics for shape-texture knowledge in computer vision

arXiv 2301.10608 ↗First posted 25 Jan 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern artificial neural networks, including convolutional neural networks and vision transformers, have mastered several computer vision tasks, including object recognition. However, there are many significant differences between the behavior and robustness of these systems and of the human visual system. Deep neural networks remain brittle and susceptible to many changes in the image that do not cause humans to misclassify images. Part of this different behavior may be explained by the type of features humans and deep neural networks use in vision tasks. Humans tend to classify objects according to their shape while deep neural networks seem to rely mostly on texture. Exploring this question is relevant, since it may lead to better performing neural network architectures and to a better understanding of the workings of the vision system of primates. In this work, we advance the state of the art in our understanding of this phenomenon, by extending previous analyses to a much larger set of deep neural network architectures. We found that the performance of models in image classification tasks is highly correlated with their shape bias measured at the output and penultimate layer. Furthermore, our results showed that the number of neurons that represent shape and texture are strongly anti-correlated, thus providing evidence that there is competition between these two types of features. Finally, we observed that while in general there is a correlation between performance and shape bias, there are significant variations between architecture families.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2023.

Builds on

33 of 42 references.

References · 33

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  4. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  6. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  7. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  8. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
  9. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  10. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  11. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  12. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
21 more
  1. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  2. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  3. 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognitioncited by 1,417
  4. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
  5. 2021Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolutioncited by 1,215
  6. 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,127
  7. 2021CrossViT: Cross-Attention Multi-Scale Vision Transformer for Image Classificationcited by 806
  8. 2021Going deeper with Image Transformerscited by 759
  9. 2021MobileViT: Light-weight, General-purpose, and Mobile-friendly Vision Transformercited by 636
  10. 2021ResMLP: Feedforward networks for image classification with data-efficient trainingcited by 338
  11. 2021XCiT: Cross-Covariance Image Transformerscited by 335
  12. 2019Adversarial Examples Improve Image Recognitioncited by 283
  13. 2018Generalisation in humans and deep neural networkscited by 237
  14. 2021Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine visioncited by 185
  15. 2021VOLO: Vision Outlooker for Visual Recognitioncited by 164
  16. 2019Interpreting Adversarially Trained Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 75
  17. 2020A Disentangling Invertible Interpretation Network for Explaining Latent Representationscited by 57
  18. 2021Shape or Texture: Understanding Discriminative Features in CNNscited by 52
  19. 2021RegNet: Self-Regulated Network for Image Classificationcited by 44
  20. 2021Does enhanced shape bias improve neural network robustness to common corruptions?cited by 32
  21. 2020The shape and simplicity biases of adversarially robust ImageNet-trained CNNscited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.