mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ExClaim: Explainable Neural Claim Verification Using Rationalization

arXiv 2301.08914 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2023cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the advent of deep learning, text generation language models have improved dramatically, with text at a similar level as human-written text. This can lead to rampant misinformation because content can now be created cheaply and distributed quickly. Automated claim verification methods exist to validate claims, but they lack foundational data and often use mainstream news as evidence sources that are strongly biased towards a specific agenda. Current claim verification methods use deep neural network models and complex algorithms for a high classification accuracy but it is at the expense of model explainability. The models are black-boxes and their decision-making process and the steps it took to arrive at a final prediction are obfuscated from the user. We introduce a novel claim verification approach, namely: ExClaim, that attempts to provide an explainable claim verification system with foundational evidence. Inspired by the legal system, ExClaim leverages rationalization to provide a verdict for the claim and justifies the verdict through a natural language explanation (rationale) to describe the model's decision-making process. ExClaim treats the verdict classification task as a question-answer problem and achieves a performance of 0.93 F1 score. It provides subtasks explanations to also justify the intermediate outcomes. Statistical and Explainable AI (XAI) evaluations are conducted to ensure valid and trustworthy outcomes. Ensuring claim verification systems are assured, rational, and explainable is an essential step toward improving Human-AI trust and the accessibility of black-box systems.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2023.

Builds on

30 of 57 references.

References · 30

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  5. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  6. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  7. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,722
  8. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  9. 2022Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Modelcited by 557
  10. 2019Text Summarization with Pretrained Encoderscited by 553
  11. 2017"Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detectioncited by 361
  12. 2017Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspectivecited by 334
18 more
  1. 2016Rationalizing Neural Predictionscited by 281
  2. 2018The Natural Language Decathlon: Multitask Learning as Question Answeringcited by 235
  3. 2020Explainable Automated Fact-Checking for Public Health Claimscited by 209
  4. 2020A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processingcited by 206
  5. 2020Generating Fact Checking Explanationscited by 132
  6. 2019Interpretable Neural Predictions with Differentiable Binary Variablescited by 126
  7. 2020GCAN: Graph-aware Co-Attention Networks for Explainable Fake News Detection on Social Mediacited by 108
  8. 2020Explainable Automated Fact-Checking: A Surveycited by 83
  9. 2019Inferring Which Medical Treatments Work from Reports of Clinical Trialscited by 63
  10. 2019XFake: Explainable Fake News Detector with Visualizationscited by 32
  11. 2021UNIREX: A Unified Learning Framework for Language Model Rationale Extractioncited by 32
  12. 2021Local Interpretations for Explainable Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 31
  13. 2021Explain and Predict, and then Predict Againcited by 29
  14. 2019Explainable Fact Checking with Probabilistic Answer Set Programmingcited by 23
  15. 2020Mining Disinformation and Fake News: Concepts, Methods, and Recent Advancementscited by 17
  16. 2020DTCA: Decision Tree-based Co-Attention Networks for Explainable Claim Verificationcited by 17
  17. 2021A Survey on AI Assurancecited by 16
  18. 2021Fake News Detection: Experiments and Approaches beyond Linguistic Featurescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

4 papers.