Computability of Optimizers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Optimization problems are a staple of today's scientific and technical landscape. However, at present, solvers of such problems are almost exclusively run on digital hardware. Using Turing machines as a mathematical model for any type of digital hardware, in this paper, we analyze fundamental limitations of this conceptual approach of solving optimization problems. Since in most applications, the optimizer itself is of significantly more interest than the optimal value of the corresponding function, we will focus on computability of the optimizer. In fact, we will show that in various situations the optimizer is unattainable on Turing machines and consequently on digital computers. Moreover, even worse, there does not exist a Turing machine, which approximates the optimizer itself up to a certain constant error. We prove such results for a variety of well-known problems from very different areas, including artificial intelligence, financial mathematics, and information theory, often deriving the even stronger result that such problems are not Banach-Mazur computable, also not even in an approximate sense.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2023.
Builds on
9 of 62 references.
References · 9
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
- 2017DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equationscited by 674
- 2021The Modern Mathematics of Deep Learningcited by 63
- 2021Can stable and accurate neural networks be computed? -- On the barriers of deep learning and Smale's 18th problemcited by 53
- 2020The troublesome kernel -- On hallucinations, no free lunches and the accuracy-stability trade-off in inverse problemscited by 40
- 2019How degenerate is the parametrization of neural networks with the ReLU activation function?cited by 15
- 2022Limitations of Deep Learning for Inverse Problems on Digital Hardwarecited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Bias Detection via Maximum Subgroup Discrepancycited by 2
- 2023Reliable AI: Does the Next Generation Require Quantum Computing?cited by 0
- 2024Computability of Classification and Deep Learning: From Theoretical Limits to Practical Feasibility through Quantizationcited by 0
- 2024Optimisation Strategies for Ensuring Fairness in Machine Learning: With and Without Demographicscited by 0
- 2025humancompatible.detect: a Python Toolkit for Detecting Bias in AI Modelscited by 0
- 2025humancompatible.detect: a Python Toolkit for Detecting Bias in AI Models29 Sep 2025
- 2025Bias Detection via Maximum Subgroup Discrepancy4 Feb 2025
- 2024Optimisation Strategies for Ensuring Fairness in Machine Learning: With and Without Demographics13 Nov 2024
- 2024Computability of Classification and Deep Learning: From Theoretical Limits to Practical Feasibility through Quantization12 Aug 2024
- 2023Reliable AI: Does the Next Generation Require Quantum Computing?3 Jul 2023