mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reliable AI: Does the Next Generation Require Quantum Computing?

arXiv 2307.01301 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2023cs.AI quant-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this survey, we aim to explore the fundamental question of whether the next generation of artificial intelligence requires quantum computing. Artificial intelligence is increasingly playing a crucial role in many aspects of our daily lives and is central to the fourth industrial revolution. It is therefore imperative that artificial intelligence is reliable and trustworthy. However, there are still many issues with reliability of artificial intelligence, such as privacy, responsibility, safety, and security, in areas such as autonomous driving, healthcare, robotics, and others. These problems can have various causes, including insufficient data, biases, and robustness problems, as well as fundamental issues such as computability problems on digital hardware. The cause of these computability problems is rooted in the fact that digital hardware is based on the computing model of the Turing machine, which is inherently discrete. Notably, our findings demonstrate that digital hardware is inherently constrained in solving problems about optimization, deep learning, or differential equations. Therefore, these limitations carry substantial implications for the field of artificial intelligence, in particular for machine learning. Furthermore, although it is well known that the quantum computer shows a quantum advantage for certain classes of problems, our findings establish that some of these limitations persist when employing quantum computing models based on the quantum circuit or the quantum Turing machine paradigm. In contrast, analog computing models, such as the Blum-Shub-Smale machine, exhibit the potential to surmount these limitations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2023.

Builds on

15 of 65 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  4. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  5. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
  6. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  7. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
  8. 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
  9. 2019On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction - Does AI come at a cost?cited by 211
  10. 2019Are We Really Making Much Progress? A Worrying Analysis of Recent Neural Recommendation Approachescited by 181
  11. 2021The Modern Mathematics of Deep Learningcited by 63
  12. 2022Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030: The One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligencecited by 16
3 more
  1. 2022Limitations of Deep Learning for Inverse Problems on Digital Hardwarecited by 9
  2. 2022Inverse Problems Are Solvable on Real Number Signal Processing Hardwarecited by 5
  3. 2023Computability of Optimizerscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.