mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Rigorous Uncertainty-Aware Quantification Framework Is Essential for Reproducible and Replicable Machine Learning Workflows

arXiv 2301.05763 ↗First posted 13 Jan 2023cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The ability to replicate predictions by machine learning (ML) or artificial intelligence (AI) models and results in scientific workflows that incorporate such ML/AI predictions is driven by numerous factors. An uncertainty-aware metric that can quantitatively assess the reproducibility of quantities of interest (QoI) would contribute to the trustworthiness of results obtained from scientific workflows involving ML/AI models. In this article, we discuss how uncertainty quantification (UQ) in a Bayesian paradigm can provide a general and rigorous framework for quantifying reproducibility for complex scientific workflows. Such as framework has the potential to fill a critical gap that currently exists in ML/AI for scientific workflows, as it will enable researchers to determine the impact of ML/AI model prediction variability on the predictive outcomes of ML/AI-powered workflows. We expect that the envisioned framework will contribute to the design of more reproducible and trustworthy workflows for diverse scientific applications, and ultimately, accelerate scientific discoveries.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2023.

Builds on

19 of 73 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  3. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  4. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 819
  5. 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 305
  6. 2020Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networkscited by 231
  7. 2019One Explanation Does Not Fit All: A Toolkit and Taxonomy of AI Explainability Techniquescited by 164
  8. 2020SoK: Certified Robustness for Deep Neural Networkscited by 105
  9. 2017Regularization for Deep Learning: A Taxonomycited by 91
  10. 2020Trustworthy AIcited by 62
  11. 2020TSS: Transformation-Specific Smoothing for Robustness Certificationcited by 49
  12. 2021Deep Ensembling with No Overhead for either Training or Testing: The All-Round Blessings of Dynamic Sparsitycited by 44
7 more
  1. 2022Sources of Irreproducibility in Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 32
  2. 2020Quantifying the multi-objective cost of uncertaintycited by 5
  3. 2020When we can trust computers (and when we can't)cited by 4
  4. 2020Optimal Experimental Design for Uncertain Systems Based on Coupled Differential Equationscited by 4
  5. 2016Ten Simple Rules for Making Research Software More Robustcited by 3
  6. 2020Reproducing GW150914: the first observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole mergercited by 3
  7. 2020Building Containerized Environments for Reproducibility and Traceability of Scientific Workflowscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.