mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning the Relation between Similarity Loss and Clustering Loss in Self-Supervised Learning

arXiv 2301.03041 ↗First posted 8 Jan 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Self-supervised learning enables networks to learn discriminative features from massive data itself. Most state-of-the-art methods maximize the similarity between two augmentations of one image based on contrastive learning. By utilizing the consistency of two augmentations, the burden of manual annotations can be freed. Contrastive learning exploits instance-level information to learn robust features. However, the learned information is probably confined to different views of the same instance. In this paper, we attempt to leverage the similarity between two distinct images to boost representation in self-supervised learning. In contrast to instance-level information, the similarity between two distinct images may provide more useful information. Besides, we analyze the relation between similarity loss and feature-level cross-entropy loss. These two losses are essential for most deep learning methods. However, the relation between these two losses is not clear. Similarity loss helps obtain instance-level representation, while feature-level cross-entropy loss helps mine the similarity between two distinct images. We provide theoretical analyses and experiments to show that a suitable combination of these two losses can get state-of-the-art results. Code is available at https://github.com/guijiejie/ICCL.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2023.

Builds on

47 of 64 references.

References · 47

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  5. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  6. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  7. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  8. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  9. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  10. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  11. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  12. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
35 more
  1. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  2. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  3. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  4. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
  5. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
  6. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  7. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
  8. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  9. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,838
  10. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,818
  11. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,610
  12. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
  13. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
  14. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,375
  15. 2018Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximizationcited by 1,265
  16. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 843
  17. 2019Self-Supervised Learning of Pretext-Invariant Representationscited by 806
  18. 2015Unsupervised Deep Embedding for Clustering Analysiscited by 763
  19. 2019Learning Representations by Maximizing Mutual Information Across Viewscited by 733
  20. 2019Data-Efficient Image Recognition with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 672
  21. 2017Large Batch Training of Convolutional Networkscited by 529
  22. 2019Self-labelling via simultaneous clustering and representation learningcited by 525
  23. 2019S4L: Self-Supervised Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 335
  24. 2020Contrastive Clusteringcited by 264
  25. 2021Understanding self-supervised Learning Dynamics without Contrastive Pairscited by 254
  26. 2020How Well Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer?cited by 213
  27. 2016Joint Unsupervised Learning of Deep Representations and Image Clusterscited by 205
  28. 2019Scaling and Benchmarking Self-Supervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 201
  29. 2017Unsupervised Learning by Predicting Noisecited by 97
  30. 2020BYOL works even without batch statisticscited by 95
  31. 2019ClusterFit: Improving Generalization of Visual Representationscited by 82
  32. 2019Unsupervised Deep Learning by Neighbourhood Discoverycited by 78
  33. 2020Understanding Self-supervised Learning with Dual Deep Networkscited by 62
  34. 2020Parametric Instance Classification for Unsupervised Visual Feature Learningcited by 41
  35. 2020Distilling Localization for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 34

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.