mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Inflected Forms Are Redundant in Question Generation Models

arXiv 2301.00397 ↗First posted 1 Jan 2023cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural models with an encoder-decoder framework provide a feasible solution to Question Generation (QG). However, after analyzing the model vocabulary we find that current models (both RNN-based and pre-training based) have more than 23% inflected forms. As a result, the encoder will generate separate embeddings for the inflected forms, leading to a waste of training data and parameters. Even worse, in decoding these models are vulnerable to irrelevant noise and they suffer from high computational costs. In this paper, we propose an approach to enhance the performance of QG by fusing word transformation. Firstly, we identify the inflected forms of words from the input of encoder, and replace them with the root words, letting the encoder pay more attention to the repetitive root words. Secondly, we propose to adapt QG as a combination of the following actions in the encode-decoder framework: generating a question word, copying a word from the source sequence or generating a word transformation type. Such extension can greatly decrease the size of predicted words in the decoder as well as noise. We apply our approach to a typical RNN-based model and textscUniLM to get the improved versions. We conduct extensive experiments on SQuAD and MS MARCO datasets. The experimental results show that the improved versions can significantly outperform the corresponding baselines in terms of BLEU, ROUGE-L and METEOR as well as time cost.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jan 2023.

Builds on

16 of 32 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  4. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  5. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  6. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
  7. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
  8. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 883
  9. 2019Unified Language Model Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding and Generationcited by 668
  10. 2017Learning to Ask: Neural Question Generation for Reading Comprehensioncited by 186
  11. 2017Neural Question Generation from Text: A Preliminary Studycited by 78
  12. 2017Question Answering and Question Generation as Dual Taskscited by 37
4 more
  1. 2016Generating Factoid Questions With Recurrent Neural Networks: The 30M Factoid Question-Answer Corpuscited by 33
  2. 2017Machine Comprehension by Text-to-Text Neural Question Generationcited by 32
  3. 2019Let's Ask Again: Refine Network for Automatic Question Generationcited by 13
  4. 2019Generating Questions for Knowledge Bases via Incorporating Diversified Contexts and Answer-Aware Losscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.