mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Label-Efficient Interactive Time-Series Anomaly Detection

arXiv 2212.14621 ↗First posted 30 Dec 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Time-series anomaly detection is an important task and has been widely applied in the industry. Since manual data annotation is expensive and inefficient, most applications adopt unsupervised anomaly detection methods, but the results are usually sub-optimal and unsatisfactory to end customers. Weak supervision is a promising paradigm for obtaining considerable labels in a low-cost way, which enables the customers to label data by writing heuristic rules rather than annotating each instance individually. However, in the time-series domain, it is hard for people to write reasonable labeling functions as the time-series data is numerically continuous and difficult to be understood. In this paper, we propose a Label-Efficient Interactive Time-Series Anomaly Detection (LEIAD) system, which enables a user to improve the results of unsupervised anomaly detection by performing only a small amount of interactions with the system. To achieve this goal, the system integrates weak supervision and active learning collaboratively while generating labeling functions automatically using only a few labeled data. All of these techniques are complementary and can promote each other in a reinforced manner. We conduct experiments on three time-series anomaly detection datasets, demonstrating that the proposed system is superior to existing solutions in both weak supervision and active learning areas. Also, the system has been tested in a real scenario in industry to show its practicality.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2022.

Builds on

20 of 38 references.

References · 20

  1. 2021TS2Vec: Towards Universal Representation of Time Seriescited by 463
  2. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
  3. 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 370
  4. 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
  5. 2019Time-Series Anomaly Detection Service at Microsoftcited by 163
  6. 2022Active Learning on a Budget: Opposite Strategies Suit High and Low Budgetscited by 131
  7. 2020Cold-start Active Learning through Self-supervised Language Modelingcited by 128
  8. 2018Training Complex Models with Multi-Task Weak Supervisioncited by 106
  9. 2020Fast and Three-rious: Speeding Up Weak Supervision with Triplet Methodscited by 98
  10. 2021WRENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Weak Supervisioncited by 95
  11. 2022A Survey on Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 66
  12. 2020Anomaly Detection in Univariate Time-series: A Survey on the State-of-the-Artcited by 55
8 more
  1. 2017Learning with Confident Examples: Rank Pruning for Robust Classification with Noisy Labelscited by 52
  2. 2018Snorkel DryBell: A Case Study in Deploying Weak Supervision at Industrial Scalecited by 52
  3. 2020Interactive Weak Supervision: Learning Useful Heuristics for Data Labelingcited by 52
  4. 2020A Survey of Active Learning for Text Classification using Deep Neural Networkscited by 50
  5. 2018modAL: A modular active learning framework for Pythoncited by 35
  6. 2021A Simple Baseline for Low-Budget Active Learningcited by 15
  7. 2021RLAD: Time Series Anomaly Detection through Reinforcement Learning and Active Learningcited by 13
  8. 2021Active WeaSuL: Improving Weak Supervision with Active Learningcited by 12

Built on by

Not cited yet.