ECG-Based Electrolyte Prediction: Evaluating Regression and Probabilistic Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Objective: Imbalances of the electrolyte concentration levels in the body can lead to catastrophic consequences, but accurate and accessible measurements could improve patient outcomes. While blood tests provide accurate measurements, they are invasive and the laboratory analysis can be slow or inaccessible. In contrast, an electrocardiogram (ECG) is a widely adopted tool which is quick and simple to acquire. However, the problem of estimating continuous electrolyte concentrations directly from ECGs is not well-studied. We therefore investigate if regression methods can be used for accurate ECG-based prediction of electrolyte concentrations. Methods: We explore the use of deep neural networks (DNNs) for this task. We analyze the regression performance across four electrolytes, utilizing a novel dataset containing over 290000 ECGs. For improved understanding, we also study the full spectrum from continuous predictions to binary classification of extreme concentration levels. To enhance clinical usefulness, we finally extend to a probabilistic regression approach and evaluate different uncertainty estimates. Results: We find that the performance varies significantly between different electrolytes, which is clinically justified in the interplay of electrolytes and their manifestation in the ECG. We also compare the regression accuracy with that of traditional machine learning models, demonstrating superior performance of DNNs. Conclusion: Discretization can lead to good classification performance, but does not help solve the original problem of predicting continuous concentration levels. While probabilistic regression demonstrates potential practical usefulness, the uncertainty estimates are not particularly well-calibrated. Significance: Our study is a first step towards accurate and reliable ECG-based prediction of electrolyte concentration levels.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2022.
Builds on
19 of 54 references.
References · 19
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2018Simple Baselines for Human Pose Estimation and Trackingcited by 502
- 2021Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 359
- 2020Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networkscited by 227
- 2019Evaluating Scalable Bayesian Deep Learning Methods for Robust Computer Visioncited by 182
- 2019Automatic diagnosis of the 12-lead ECG using a deep neural networkcited by 164
- 2017Fine-Grained Head Pose Estimation Without Keypointscited by 163
7 more
- 2019Rank consistent ordinal regression for neural networks with application to age estimationcited by 132
- 2018Lightweight Probabilistic Deep Networkscited by 77
- 2017Cardiologist-Level Arrhythmia Detection with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 52
- 2018A Comprehensive Analysis of Deep Regressioncited by 48
- 2019Mixture Dense Regression for Object Detection and Human Pose Estimationcited by 29
- 2019Deep neural networks can predict mortality from 12-lead electrocardiogram voltage datacited by 20
- 2021Benchmarking Uncertainty Quantification on Biosignal Classification Tasks under Dataset Shiftcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.