HypUC: Hyperfine Uncertainty Calibration with Gradient-boosted Corrections for Reliable Regression on Imbalanced Electrocardiograms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The automated analysis of medical time series, such as the electrocardiogram (ECG), electroencephalogram (EEG), pulse oximetry, etc, has the potential to serve as a valuable tool for diagnostic decisions, allowing for remote monitoring of patients and more efficient use of expensive and time-consuming medical procedures. Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been demonstrated to process such signals effectively. However, previous research has primarily focused on classifying medical time series rather than attempting to regress the continuous-valued physiological parameters central to diagnosis. One significant challenge in this regard is the imbalanced nature of the dataset, as a low prevalence of abnormal conditions can lead to heavily skewed data that results in inaccurate predictions and a lack of certainty in such predictions when deployed. To address these challenges, we propose HypUC, a framework for imbalanced probabilistic regression in medical time series, making several contributions. (i) We introduce a simple kernel density-based technique to tackle the imbalanced regression problem with medical time series. (ii) Moreover, we employ a probabilistic regression framework that allows uncertainty estimation for the predicted continuous values. (iii) We also present a new approach to calibrate the predicted uncertainty further. (iv) Finally, we demonstrate a technique to use calibrated uncertainty estimates to improve the predicted continuous value and show the efficacy of the calibrated uncertainty estimates to flag unreliable predictions. HypUC is evaluated on a large, diverse, real-world dataset of ECGs collected from millions of patients, outperforming several conventional baselines on various diagnostic tasks, suggesting a potential use-case for the reliable clinical deployment of deep learning models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2023.
Builds on
16 of 60 references.
References · 16
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 680
- 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 422
- 2021Delving into Deep Imbalanced Regressioncited by 158
- 2018Uncertainty Estimates and Multi-Hypotheses Networks for Optical Flowcited by 135
- 2017A Tutorial on Kernel Density Estimation and Recent Advancescited by 101
- 2017Cardiologist-Level Arrhythmia Detection with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 53
- 2020Probabilistic Machine Learning for Healthcarecited by 23
- 2022BayesCap: Bayesian Identity Cap for Calibrated Uncertainty in Frozen Neural Networkscited by 23
- 2020Calibration of Model Uncertainty for Dropout Variational Inferencecited by 18
- 2021Towards Lower-Dose PET using Physics-Based Uncertainty-Aware Multimodal Learning with Robustness to Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 18
- 2021Uncertainty-Guided Progressive GANs for Medical Image Translationcited by 16
4 more
- 2021Robustness via Uncertainty-aware Cycle Consistencycited by 16
- 2023ProbVLM: Probabilistic Adapter for Frozen Vision-Language Modelscited by 7
- 2023USIM-DAL: Uncertainty-aware Statistical Image Modeling-based Dense Active Learning for Super-resolutioncited by 4
- 2022ECG-Based Electrolyte Prediction: Evaluating Regression and Probabilistic Methodscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.