Automated Gadget Discovery in Science
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, reinforcement learning (RL) has become increasingly successful in its application to science and the process of scientific discovery in general. However, while RL algorithms learn to solve increasingly complex problems, interpreting the solutions they provide becomes ever more challenging. In this work, we gain insights into an RL agent's learned behavior through a post-hoc analysis based on sequence mining and clustering. Specifically, frequent and compact subroutines, used by the agent to solve a given task, are distilled as gadgets and then grouped by various metrics. This process of gadget discovery develops in three stages: First, we use an RL agent to generate data, then, we employ a mining algorithm to extract gadgets and finally, the obtained gadgets are grouped by a density-based clustering algorithm. We demonstrate our method by applying it to two quantum-inspired RL environments. First, we consider simulated quantum optics experiments for the design of high-dimensional multipartite entangled states where the algorithm finds gadgets that correspond to modern interferometer setups. Second, we consider a circuit-based quantum computing environment where the algorithm discovers various gadgets for quantum information processing, such as quantum teleportation. This approach for analyzing the policy of a learned agent is agent and environment agnostic and can yield interesting insights into any agent's policy.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Dec 2022.
Builds on
23 of 54 references.
References · 23
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
- 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,353
- 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,194
- 2016Unifying Count-Based Exploration and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 639
- 2016Variational Intrinsic Controlcited by 267
- 2017Count-Based Exploration with Neural Density Modelscited by 257
- 2015Variational Information Maximisation for Intrinsically Motivated Reinforcement Learningcited by 144
- 2020Explainable Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 141
- 2018Discovering physical concepts with neural networkscited by 117
- 2017Surprise-Based Intrinsic Motivation for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 83
- 2018CURIOUS: Intrinsically Motivated Modular Multi-Goal Reinforcement Learningcited by 79
- 2021Reinforcement learning for optimization of variational quantum circuit architecturescited by 77
11 more
- 2019Interestingness Elements for Explainable Reinforcement Learning: Understanding Agents' Capabilities and Limitationscited by 50
- 2017Applications of Deep Learning and Reinforcement Learning to Biological Datacited by 45
- 2017Active learning machine learns to create new quantum experimentscited by 41
- 2021Deep reinforcement learning in medical imaging: A literature reviewcited by 34
- 2018Optimizing Quantum Error Correction Codes with Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
- 2020Operationally meaningful representations of physical systems in neural networkscited by 16
- 2020Curiosity in exploring chemical space: Intrinsic rewards for deep molecular reinforcement learningcited by 16
- 2018Toward an AI Physicist for Unsupervised Learningcited by 12
- 2019How a minimal learning agent can infer the existence of unobserved variables in a complex environmentcited by 7
- 2019Learning the Arrow of Timecited by 2
- 2018Accelerating Empowerment Computation with UCT Tree Searchcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.