Learning from Training Dynamics: Identifying Mislabeled Data Beyond Manually Designed Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While mislabeled or ambiguously-labeled samples in the training set could negatively affect the performance of deep models, diagnosing the dataset and identifying mislabeled samples helps to improve the generalization power. Training dynamics, i.e., the traces left by iterations of optimization algorithms, have recently been proved to be effective to localize mislabeled samples with hand-crafted features. In this paper, beyond manually designed features, we introduce a novel learning-based solution, leveraging a noise detector, instanced by an LSTM network, which learns to predict whether a sample was mislabeled using the raw training dynamics as input. Specifically, the proposed method trains the noise detector in a supervised manner using the dataset with synthesized label noises and can adapt to various datasets (either naturally or synthesized label-noised) without retraining. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the proposed method. We train the noise detector based on the synthesized label-noised CIFAR dataset and test such noise detector on Tiny ImageNet, CUB-200, Caltech-256, WebVision and Clothing1M. Results show that the proposed method precisely detects mislabeled samples on various datasets without further adaptation, and outperforms state-of-the-art methods. Besides, more experiments demonstrate that the mislabel identification can guide a label correction, namely data debugging, providing orthogonal improvements of algorithm-centric state-of-the-art techniques from the data aspect.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2022.
Builds on
39 of 62 references.
References · 39
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
27 more
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
- 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 562
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
- 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
- 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 423
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
- 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
- 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
- 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 259
- 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
- 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
- 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
- 2015Learning Visual Features from Large Weakly Supervised Datacited by 165
- 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
- 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 160
- 2021Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example Difficultycited by 139
- 2019Meta Label Correction for Noisy Label Learningcited by 108
- 2019Image Classification with Deep Learning in the Presence of Noisy Labels: A Surveycited by 101
- 2015Webly Supervised Learning of Convolutional Networkscited by 95
- 2022DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Developmentcited by 89
- 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
- 2017Toward Robustness against Label Noise in Training Deep Discriminative Neural Networkscited by 78
- 2019Let's Agree to Agree: Neural Networks Share Classification Order on Real Datasetscited by 55
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2024Dissecting Sample Hardness: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Hardness Characterization Methods for Data-Centric AIcited by 11
- 2024SAP: Corrective Machine Unlearning with Scaled Activation Projection for Label Noise Robustnesscited by 10
- 2024Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Data Mining Perspectivecited by 9
- 2024Targeted synthetic data generation for tabular data via hardness characterizationcited by 4
- 2025Enhanced Sample Selection with Confidence Tracking: Identifying Correctly Labeled yet Hard-to-Learn Samples in Noisy Datacited by 3
- 2024Selfish Evolution: Making Discoveries in Extreme Label Noise with the Help of Overfitting Dynamicscited by 0
- 2025Reducing Class Bias In Data-Balanced Datasets Through Hardness-Based Resamplingcited by 0
- 2025LiLAW: Lightweight Learnable Adaptive Weighting to Learn Sample Difficulty & Improve Noisy Trainingcited by 0
- 2026The Blind Spot in 2D Infants' Pose Estimation:Robust Learning from Noisy Annotationscited by 0
- 2026The Blind Spot in 2D Infants' Pose Estimation:Robust Learning from Noisy Annotations3 Sep 2026
- 2025LiLAW: Lightweight Learnable Adaptive Weighting to Learn Sample Difficulty & Improve Noisy Training25 Sep 2025
- 2025Enhanced Sample Selection with Confidence Tracking: Identifying Correctly Labeled yet Hard-to-Learn Samples in Noisy Data24 Apr 2025
- 2025Reducing Class Bias In Data-Balanced Datasets Through Hardness-Based Resampling9 Apr 2025
- 2024Selfish Evolution: Making Discoveries in Extreme Label Noise with the Help of Overfitting Dynamics26 Nov 2024
- 2024Targeted synthetic data generation for tabular data via hardness characterization1 Oct 2024
- 2024SAP: Corrective Machine Unlearning with Scaled Activation Projection for Label Noise Robustness13 Mar 2024
- 2024Dissecting Sample Hardness: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Hardness Characterization Methods for Data-Centric AI7 Mar 2024
- 2024Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Data Mining Perspective9 Jan 2024