mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning from Training Dynamics: Identifying Mislabeled Data Beyond Manually Designed Features

arXiv 2212.09321 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2022cs.CV cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While mislabeled or ambiguously-labeled samples in the training set could negatively affect the performance of deep models, diagnosing the dataset and identifying mislabeled samples helps to improve the generalization power. Training dynamics, i.e., the traces left by iterations of optimization algorithms, have recently been proved to be effective to localize mislabeled samples with hand-crafted features. In this paper, beyond manually designed features, we introduce a novel learning-based solution, leveraging a noise detector, instanced by an LSTM network, which learns to predict whether a sample was mislabeled using the raw training dynamics as input. Specifically, the proposed method trains the noise detector in a supervised manner using the dataset with synthesized label noises and can adapt to various datasets (either naturally or synthesized label-noised) without retraining. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the proposed method. We train the noise detector based on the synthesized label-noised CIFAR dataset and test such noise detector on Tiny ImageNet, CUB-200, Caltech-256, WebVision and Clothing1M. Results show that the proposed method precisely detects mislabeled samples on various datasets without further adaptation, and outperforms state-of-the-art methods. Besides, more experiments demonstrate that the mislabel identification can guide a label correction, namely data debugging, providing orthogonal improvements of algorithm-centric state-of-the-art techniques from the data aspect.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2022.

Builds on

39 of 62 references.

References · 39

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  6. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  7. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  8. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  9. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
  10. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  11. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  12. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
27 more
  1. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  2. 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 562
  3. 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
  4. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  5. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
  6. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
  7. 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 423
  8. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
  9. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
  10. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  11. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  12. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  13. 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 259
  14. 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
  15. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  16. 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
  17. 2015Learning Visual Features from Large Weakly Supervised Datacited by 165
  18. 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
  19. 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 160
  20. 2021Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example Difficultycited by 139
  21. 2019Meta Label Correction for Noisy Label Learningcited by 108
  22. 2019Image Classification with Deep Learning in the Presence of Noisy Labels: A Surveycited by 101
  23. 2015Webly Supervised Learning of Convolutional Networkscited by 95
  24. 2022DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Developmentcited by 89
  25. 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
  26. 2017Toward Robustness against Label Noise in Training Deep Discriminative Neural Networkscited by 78
  27. 2019Let's Agree to Agree: Neural Networks Share Classification Order on Real Datasetscited by 55

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

9 papers.