mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Targeted synthetic data generation for tabular data via hardness characterization

arXiv 2410.00759 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data augmentation via synthetic data generation has been shown to be effective in improving model performance and robustness in the context of scarce or low-quality data. Using the data valuation framework to statistically identify beneficial and detrimental observations, we introduce a simple augmentation pipeline that generates only high-value training points based on hardness characterization, in a computationally efficient manner. We first empirically demonstrate via benchmarks on real data that Shapley-based data valuation methods perform comparably with learning-based methods in hardness characterization tasks, while offering significant computational advantages. Then, we show that synthetic data generators trained on the hardest points outperform non-targeted data augmentation on a number of tabular datasets. Our approach improves the quality of out-of-sample predictions and it is computationally more efficient compared to non-targeted methods.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2024.

Builds on

33 of 41 references.

References · 33

  1. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  2. 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 695
  3. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
  4. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
  5. 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 530
  6. 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
  7. 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 523
  8. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
  9. 2020Dataset Condensation with Gradient Matchingcited by 510
  10. 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 423
  11. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
  12. 2022TabDDPM: Modelling Tabular Data with Diffusion Modelscited by 373
21 more
  1. 2019Towards Efficient Data Valuation Based on the Shapley Valuecited by 279
  2. 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 259
  3. 2023Mixed-Type Tabular Data Synthesis with Score-based Diffusion in Latent Spacecited by 183
  4. 2021Beta Shapley: a Unified and Noise-reduced Data Valuation Framework for Machine Learningcited by 162
  5. 2019Efficient Task-Specific Data Valuation for Nearest Neighbor Algorithmscited by 147
  6. 2023Machine Learning for Synthetic Data Generation: A Reviewcited by 118
  7. 2020Estimating Example Difficulty Using Variance of Gradientscited by 96
  8. 2018Synthesizing Tabular Data using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 92
  9. 2022STaSy: Score-based Tabular data Synthesiscited by 85
  10. 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
  11. 2024Data Shapley in One Training Runcited by 76
  12. 2023OpenDataVal: a Unified Benchmark for Data Valuationcited by 55
  13. 2022Adversarial random forests for density estimation and generative modelingcited by 44
  14. 2023Data-OOB: Out-of-bag Estimate as a Simple and Efficient Data Valuecited by 38
  15. 2023Beyond Confidence: Reliable Models Should Also Consider Atypicalitycited by 25
  16. 2023Reimagining Synthetic Tabular Data Generation through Data-Centric AI: A Comprehensive Benchmarkcited by 23
  17. 2022Data-IQ: Characterizing subgroups with heterogeneous outcomes in tabular datacited by 22
  18. 2023Threshold KNN-Shapley: A Linear-Time and Privacy-Friendly Approach to Data Valuationcited by 19
  19. 2019The Machine Learning Bazaar: Harnessing the ML Ecosystem for Effective System Developmentcited by 13
  20. 2024Dissecting Sample Hardness: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Hardness Characterization Methods for Data-Centric AIcited by 11
  21. 2022Learning from Training Dynamics: Identifying Mislabeled Data Beyond Manually Designed Featurescited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.