Improving group robustness under noisy labels using predictive uncertainty
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The standard empirical risk minimization (ERM) can underperform on certain minority groups (i.e., waterbirds in lands or landbirds in water) due to the spurious correlation between the input and its label. Several studies have improved the worst-group accuracy by focusing on the high-loss samples. The hypothesis behind this is that such high-loss samples are textitspurious-cue-free (SCF) samples. However, these approaches can be problematic since the high-loss samples may also be samples with noisy labels in the real-world scenarios. To resolve this issue, we utilize the predictive uncertainty of a model to improve the worst-group accuracy under noisy labels. To motivate this, we theoretically show that the high-uncertainty samples are the SCF samples in the binary classification problem. This theoretical result implies that the predictive uncertainty is an adequate indicator to identify SCF samples in a noisy label setting. Motivated from this, we propose a novel ENtropy based Debiasing (END) framework that prevents models from learning the spurious cues while being robust to the noisy labels. In the END framework, we first train the textitidentification model to obtain the SCF samples from a training set using its predictive uncertainty. Then, another model is trained on the dataset augmented with an oversampled SCF set. The experimental results show that our END framework outperforms other strong baselines on several real-world benchmarks that consider both the noisy labels and the spurious-cues.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2022.
Builds on
34 of 61 references.
References · 34
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
22 more
- 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 655
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
- 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
- 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 342
- 2018Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problemcited by 323
- 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
- 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
- 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
- 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
- 2018DeepDTA: Deep Drug-Target Binding Affinity Predictioncited by 171
- 2021A Fine-Grained Analysis on Distribution Shiftcited by 171
- 2016Variance-based regularization with convex objectivescited by 153
- 2020Understanding the Failure Modes of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 146
- 2019Distributionally Robust Language Modelingcited by 142
- 2022Spread Spurious Attribute: Improving Worst-group Accuracy with Spurious Attribute Estimationcited by 88
- 2019Combating Label Noise in Deep Learning Using Abstentioncited by 86
- 2020Mind the Trade-off: Debiasing NLU Models without Degrading the In-distribution Performancecited by 85
- 2021Jo-SRC: A Contrastive Approach for Combating Noisy Labelscited by 80
- 2020Coping with Label Shift via Distributionally Robust Optimisationcited by 69
- 2021Understanding the role of importance weighting for deep learningcited by 38
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Controllable Prompt Tuning For Balancing Group Distributional Robustnesscited by 10
- 2024Robustness to Subpopulation Shift with Domain Label Noise via Regularized Annotation of Domainscited by 6
- 2024Label Noise Robustness for Domain-Agnostic Fair Corrections via Nearest Neighbors Label Spreadingcited by 0
- 2026Optimal Transport Reweighting for Robust Learning under Spurious Correlations and Label Noisecited by 0
- 2026Optimal Transport Reweighting for Robust Learning under Spurious Correlations and Label Noise1 Oct 2026
- 2024Label Noise Robustness for Domain-Agnostic Fair Corrections via Nearest Neighbors Label Spreading13 Jun 2024
- 2024Controllable Prompt Tuning For Balancing Group Distributional Robustness5 Mar 2024
- 2024Robustness to Subpopulation Shift with Domain Label Noise via Regularized Annotation of Domains16 Feb 2024