Label Noise Robustness for Domain-Agnostic Fair Corrections via Nearest Neighbors Label Spreading
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Last-layer retraining methods have emerged as an efficient framework for correcting existing base models. Within this framework, several methods have been proposed to deal with correcting models for subgroup fairness with and without group membership information. Importantly, prior work has demonstrated that many methods are susceptible to noisy labels. To this end, we propose a drop-in correction for label noise in last-layer retraining, and demonstrate that it achieves state-of-the-art worst-group accuracy for a broad range of symmetric label noise and across a wide variety of datasets exhibiting spurious correlations. Our proposed approach uses label spreading on a latent nearest neighbors graph and has minimal computational overhead compared to existing methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2024.
Builds on
22 of 28 references.
References · 22
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 523
- 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 404
- 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 381
- 2019Label Propagation for Deep Semi-supervised Learningcited by 289
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 256
- 2022Improving Out-of-Distribution Robustness via Selective Augmentationcited by 202
- 2021Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracycited by 178
- 2022Spread Spurious Attribute: Improving Worst-group Accuracy with Spurious Attribute Estimationcited by 88
10 more
- 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
- 2023Simple and Fast Group Robustness by Automatic Feature Reweightingcited by 68
- 2022Learning with Neighbor Consistency for Noisy Labelscited by 55
- 2023Towards Last-layer Retraining for Group Robustness with Fewer Annotationscited by 54
- 2019A Tunable Loss Function for Robust Classification: Calibration, Landscape, and Generalizationcited by 23
- 2022Why does Throwing Away Data Improve Worst-Group Error?cited by 22
- 2021Being Properly Impropercited by 11
- 2024Robustness to Subpopulation Shift with Domain Label Noise via Regularized Annotation of Domainscited by 7
- 2022Improving group robustness under noisy labels using predictive uncertaintycited by 4
- 2024Theoretical Guarantees of Data Augmented Last Layer Retraining Methodscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.