mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Algorithmic progress in computer vision

arXiv 2212.05153 ↗First posted 10 Dec 2022cs.CV cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate algorithmic progress in image classification on ImageNet, perhaps the most well-known test bed for computer vision. We estimate a model, informed by work on neural scaling laws, and infer a decomposition of progress into the scaling of compute, data, and algorithms. Using Shapley values to attribute performance improvements, we find that algorithmic improvements have been roughly as important as the scaling of compute for progress computer vision. Our estimates indicate that algorithmic innovations mostly take the form of compute-augmenting algorithmic advances (which enable researchers to get better performance from less compute), not data-augmenting algorithmic advances. We find that compute-augmenting algorithmic advances are made at a pace more than twice as fast as the rate usually associated with Moore's law. In particular, we estimate that compute-augmenting innovations halve compute requirements every nine months (95% confidence interval: 4 to 25 months).

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2022.

Builds on

6 of 20 references.

References · 6

  1. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
  2. 2020The Computational Limits of Deep Learningcited by 188
  3. 2021All Tokens Matter: Token Labeling for Training Better Vision Transformerscited by 144
  4. 2020Measuring the Algorithmic Efficiency of Neural Networkscited by 51
  5. 2022Progress in Mathematical Programming Solvers from 2001 to 2020cited by 10
  6. 2020A Time Leap Challenge for SAT Solvingcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 6.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: