mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

What does it take to catch a Chinchilla? Verifying Rules on Large-Scale Neural Network Training via Compute Monitoring

arXiv 2303.11341 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As advanced machine learning systems' capabilities begin to play a significant role in geopolitics and societal order, it may become imperative that (1) governments be able to enforce rules on the development of advanced ML systems within their borders, and (2) countries be able to verify each other's compliance with potential future international agreements on advanced ML development. This work analyzes one mechanism to achieve this, by monitoring the computing hardware used for large-scale NN training. The framework's primary goal is to provide governments high confidence that no actor uses large quantities of specialized ML chips to execute a training run in violation of agreed rules. At the same time, the system does not curtail the use of consumer computing devices, and maintains the privacy and confidentiality of ML practitioners' models, data, and hyperparameters. The system consists of interventions at three stages: (1) using on-chip firmware to occasionally save snapshots of the the neural network weights stored in device memory, in a form that an inspector could later retrieve; (2) saving sufficient information about each training run to prove to inspectors the details of the training run that had resulted in the snapshotted weights; and (3) monitoring the chip supply chain to ensure that no actor can avoid discovery by amassing a large quantity of un-tracked chips. The proposed design decomposes the ML training rule verification problem into a series of narrow technical challenges, including a new variant of the Proof-of-Learning problem [Jia et al. '21].

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2023.

Builds on

27 of 69 references.

References · 27

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  4. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  5. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  6. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  7. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
  8. 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 993
  9. 2022GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Modelcited by 837
  10. 2023FlexGen: High-Throughput Generative Inference of Large Language Models with a Single GPUcited by 567
  11. 2022Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Modelcited by 557
  12. 2021Unsolved Problems in ML Safetycited by 291
15 more
  1. 2022Teaching Small Language Models to Reasoncited by 279
  2. 2022Predictability and Surprise in Large Generative Modelscited by 209
  3. 2022Compute Trends Across Three Eras of Machine Learningcited by 161
  4. 2018The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigationcited by 159
  5. 2022Decentralized Training of Foundation Models in Heterogeneous Environmentscited by 87
  6. 2021Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Actcited by 82
  7. 2021Proof-of-Learning: Definitions and Practicecited by 81
  8. 2023The Gradient of Generative AI Release: Methods and Considerationscited by 63
  9. 2023SWARM Parallelism: Training Large Models Can Be Surprisingly Communication-Efficientcited by 58
  10. 2021Scaling Laws for Deep Learningcited by 25
  11. 2021"Adversarial Examples" for Proof-of-Learningcited by 19
  12. 2020On the Replicability and Reproducibility of Deep Learning in Software Engineeringcited by 16
  13. 2022Algorithmic progress in computer visioncited by 13
  14. 2020Regulating Artificial Intelligence: Proposal for a Global Solutioncited by 10
  15. 2018Computational Power and the Social Impact of Artificial Intelligencecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 9; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
  2. 2023An Overview of Catastrophic AI Riskscited by 214
  3. 2023AI capabilities can be significantly improved without expensive retrainingcited by 28
  4. 2023Tools for Verifying Neural Models' Training Datacited by 21
  5. 2024Lies, Damned Lies, and Distributional Language Statistics: Persuasion and Deception with Large Language Modelscited by 14
  6. 2024Trust AI Regulation? Discerning users are vital to build trust and effective AI regulationcited by 9
  7. 2024Verification methods for international AI agreementscited by 9
  8. 2023International Governance of Civilian AI: A Jurisdictional Certification Approachcited by 8
  9. 2023An International Consortium for Evaluations of Societal-Scale Risks from Advanced AIcited by 5
  10. 2023Towards Responsible Governance of Biological Design Toolscited by 5
  11. 2025A Theory of Inference Compute Scaling: Reasoning through Directed Stochastic Skill Searchcited by 5
  12. 2023Taking control: Policies to address extinction risks from advanced AIcited by 3
8 more
  1. 2026Detecting Hidden ML Training With Zero-Overhead Telemetrycited by 3
  2. 2025What Is AI Safety? What Do We Want It to Be?cited by 2
  3. 2025PoTS: Proof-of-Training-Steps for Backdoor Detection in Large Language Modelscited by 2
  4. 2026Zero knowledge verification for frontier AI training is possiblecited by 2
  5. 2023Multinational AGI Consortium (MAGIC): A Proposal for International Coordination on AIcited by 1
  6. 2026AI Survival Stories: a Taxonomic Analysis of AI Existential Riskcited by 0
  7. 2026Privacy-Preserving AI Verification via Minimal Information Disclosurecited by 0
  8. 2026Workload Identification with Physical Side Channels for AI Governancecited by 0