mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Physics-Informed Model-Based Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2212.02179 ↗First posted 5 Dec 2022cs.LG cs.ROcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We apply reinforcement learning (RL) to robotics tasks. One of the drawbacks of traditional RL algorithms has been their poor sample efficiency. One approach to improve the sample efficiency is model-based RL. In our model-based RL algorithm, we learn a model of the environment, essentially its transition dynamics and reward function, use it to generate imaginary trajectories and backpropagate through them to update the policy, exploiting the differentiability of the model. Intuitively, learning more accurate models should lead to better model-based RL performance. Recently, there has been growing interest in developing better deep neural network based dynamics models for physical systems, by utilizing the structure of the underlying physics. We focus on robotic systems undergoing rigid body motion without contacts. We compare two versions of our model-based RL algorithm, one which uses a standard deep neural network based dynamics model and the other which uses a much more accurate, physics-informed neural network based dynamics model. We show that, in model-based RL, model accuracy mainly matters in environments that are sensitive to initial conditions, where numerical errors accumulate fast. In these environments, the physics-informed version of our algorithm achieves significantly better average-return and sample efficiency. In environments that are not sensitive to initial conditions, both versions of our algorithm achieve similar average-return, while the physics-informed version achieves better sample efficiency. We also show that, in challenging environments, physics-informed model-based RL achieves better average-return than state-of-the-art model-free RL algorithms such as Soft Actor-Critic, as it computes the policy-gradient analytically, while the latter estimates it through sampling.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2022.

Builds on

21 of 28 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  3. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  4. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  5. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  6. 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,598
  7. 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,179
  8. 2020Mastering Atari with Discrete World Modelscited by 990
  9. 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 753
  10. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 702
  11. 2019Differentiable Convex Optimization Layerscited by 458
  12. 2020Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 388
9 more
  1. 2019Deep Lagrangian Networks: Using Physics as Model Prior for Deep Learningcited by 205
  2. 2019Symplectic ODE-Net: Learning Hamiltonian Dynamics with Controlcited by 183
  3. 2015Learning Continuous Control Policies by Stochastic Value Gradientscited by 156
  4. 2020Simplifying Hamiltonian and Lagrangian Neural Networks via Explicit Constraintscited by 102
  5. 2020Dissipative SymODEN: Encoding Hamiltonian Dynamics with Dissipation and Control into Deep Learningcited by 77
  6. 2020Model-Augmented Actor-Critic: Backpropagating through Pathscited by 61
  7. 2020Benchmarking Energy-Conserving Neural Networks for Learning Dynamics from Datacited by 40
  8. 2021Extending Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Neural Networks with Differentiable Contact Modelscited by 33
  9. 2019Deep Lagrangian Networks for end-to-end learning of energy-based control for under-actuated systemscited by 32

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 6.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area: