mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Physics-Informed Policy Optimization via Analytic Dynamics Regularization

arXiv 2603.14469 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2026cs.RO cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved strong performance in robotic control; however, state-of-the-art policy learning methods, such as actor-critic methods, still suffer from high sample complexity and often produce physically inconsistent actions. This limitation stems from neural policies implicitly rediscovering complex physics from data alone, despite accurate dynamics models being readily available in simulators. In this paper, we introduce a novel physics-informed RL framework, called PIPER, that seamlessly integrates physical constraints directly into neural policy optimization with analytical soft physics constraints. At the core of our method is the integration of a differentiable Lagrangian residual as a regularization term within the actor's objective. This residual, extracted from a robot's simulator description, subtly biases policy updates towards dynamically consistent solutions. Crucially, this physics integration is realized through an additional loss term during policy optimization, requiring no alterations to existing simulators or core RL algorithms. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method significantly improves learning efficiency, stability, and control accuracy, establishing a new paradigm for efficient and physically consistent robotic control.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2026.

Builds on

14 of 23 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  3. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  4. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
  5. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
  6. 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 753
  7. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 702
  8. 2018Residual Reinforcement Learning for Robot Controlcited by 242
  9. 2018Safe Exploration in Continuous Action Spacescited by 237
  10. 2019Deep Lagrangian Networks: Using Physics as Model Prior for Deep Learningcited by 205
  11. 2020Controlling Overestimation Bias with Truncated Mixture of Continuous Distributional Quantile Criticscited by 154
  12. 2022Physics-Informed Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
2 more
  1. 2024Equivariant Action Sampling for Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 4
  2. 2023Learning passive policies with virtual energy tanks in roboticscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.