mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Rethinking Two Consensuses of the Transferability in Deep Learning

arXiv 2212.00399 ↗First posted 1 Dec 2022cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep transfer learning (DTL) has formed a long-term quest toward enabling deep neural networks (DNNs) to reuse historical experiences as efficiently as humans. This ability is named knowledge transferability. A commonly used paradigm for DTL is firstly learning general knowledge (pre-training) and then reusing (fine-tuning) them for a specific target task. There are two consensuses of transferability of pre-trained DNNs: (1) a larger domain gap between pre-training and downstream data brings lower transferability; (2) the transferability gradually decreases from lower layers (near input) to higher layers (near output). However, these consensuses were basically drawn from the experiments based on natural images, which limits their scope of application. This work aims to study and complement them from a broader perspective by proposing a method to measure the transferability of pre-trained DNN parameters. Our experiments on twelve diverse image classification datasets get similar conclusions to the previous consensuses. More importantly, two new findings are presented, i.e., (1) in addition to the domain gap, a larger data amount and huge dataset diversity of downstream target task also prohibit the transferability; (2) although the lower layers learn basic image features, they are usually not the most transferable layers due to their domain sensitivity.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2022.

Builds on

24 of 42 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  4. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  5. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  6. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  7. 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,327
  8. 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,323
  9. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
  10. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 560
  11. 2017Time-Contrastive Networks: Self-Supervised Learning from Videocited by 453
  12. 2013DeCAF: A Deep Convolutional Activation Feature for Generic Visual Recognitioncited by 422
12 more
  1. 2018Rethinking ImageNet Pre-trainingcited by 376
  2. 2018Strong-Weak Distribution Alignment for Adaptive Object Detectioncited by 269
  3. 2017Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?cited by 220
  4. 2019Representation Similarity Analysis for Efficient Task taxonomy & Transfer Learningcited by 86
  5. 2019DELTA: DEep Learning Transfer using Feature Map with Attention for Convolutional Networkscited by 80
  6. 2020How Useful is Self-Supervised Pretraining for Visual Tasks?cited by 80
  7. 2022What Makes Transfer Learning Work For Medical Images: Feature Reuse & Other Factorscited by 61
  8. 2022Transferability in Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 57
  9. 2020USCL: Pretraining Deep Ultrasound Image Diagnosis Model through Video Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 34
  10. 2020Bi-tuning of Pre-trained Representationscited by 15
  11. 2022HiCo: Hierarchical Contrastive Learning for Ultrasound Video Model Pretrainingcited by 7
  12. 2018On the Transferability of Representations in Neural Networks Between Datasets and Taskscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

3 papers.