On the Compatibility between Neural Networks and Partial Differential Equations for Physics-informed Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We shed light on a pitfall and an opportunity in physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). We prove that a multilayer perceptron (MLP) only with ReLU (Rectified Linear Unit) or ReLU-like Lipschitz activation functions will always lead to a vanished Hessian. Such a network-imposed constraint contradicts any second- or higher-order partial differential equations (PDEs). Therefore, a ReLU-based MLP cannot form a permissible function space for the approximation of their solutions. Inspired by this pitfall, we prove that a linear PDE up to the n-th order can be strictly satisfied by an MLP with Cn activation functions when the weights of its output layer lie on a certain hyperplane, as called the out-layer-hyperplane. An MLP equipped with the out-layer-hyperplane becomes "physics-enforced", no longer requiring a loss function for the PDE itself (but only those for the initial and boundary conditions). Such a hyperplane exists not only for MLPs but for any network architecture tailed by a fully-connected hidden layer. To our knowledge, this should be the first PINN architecture that enforces point-wise correctness of PDEs. We show a closed-form expression of the out-layer-hyperplane for second-order linear PDEs, which can be generalised to higher-order nonlinear PDEs.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2022.
Builds on
21 of 36 references.
References · 21
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
- 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,170
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 629
- 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 617
- 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 603
- 2020Multipole Graph Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 343
- 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 329
- 2020hp-VPINNs: Variational Physics-Informed Neural Networks With Domain Decompositioncited by 236
- 2021Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problemscited by 220
- 2021Finite Basis Physics-Informed Neural Networks (FBPINNs): a scalable domain decomposition approach for solving differential equationscited by 142
9 more
- 2019The Convergence Rate of Neural Networks for Learned Functions of Different Frequenciescited by 134
- 2020Estimates on the generalization error of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for approximating a class of inverse problems for PDEscited by 101
- 2020A Method for Representing Periodic Functions and Enforcing Exactly Periodic Boundary Conditions with Deep Neural Networkscited by 86
- 2020Multi-scale Deep Neural Network (MscaleDNN) for Solving Poisson-Boltzmann Equation in Complex Domainscited by 78
- 2021The Old and the New: Can Physics-Informed Deep-Learning Replace Traditional Linear Solvers?cited by 61
- 2019Physical Symmetries Embedded in Neural Networkscited by 40
- 2020PFNN: A Penalty-Free Neural Network Method for Solving a Class of Second-Order Boundary-Value Problems on Complex Geometriescited by 38
- 2020Building high accuracy emulators for scientific simulations with deep neural architecture searchcited by 36
- 2019A Phase Shift Deep Neural Network for High Frequency Approximation and Wave Problemscited by 34
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.