Domain Mismatch Doesn't Always Prevent Cross-Lingual Transfer Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Cross-lingual transfer learning without labeled target language data or parallel text has been surprisingly effective in zero-shot cross-lingual classification, question answering, unsupervised machine translation, etc. However, some recent publications have claimed that domain mismatch prevents cross-lingual transfer, and their results show that unsupervised bilingual lexicon induction (UBLI) and unsupervised neural machine translation (UNMT) do not work well when the underlying monolingual corpora come from different domains (e.g., French text from Wikipedia but English text from UN proceedings). In this work, we show that a simple initialization regimen can overcome much of the effect of domain mismatch in cross-lingual transfer. We pre-train word and contextual embeddings on the concatenated domain-mismatched corpora, and use these as initializations for three tasks: MUSE UBLI, UN Parallel UNMT, and the SemEval 2017 cross-lingual word similarity task. In all cases, our results challenge the conclusions of prior work by showing that proper initialization can recover a large portion of the losses incurred by domain mismatch.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2022.
Builds on
26 of 40 references.
References · 26
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
- 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
- 2019Cross-lingual Language Model Pretrainingcited by 1,088
- 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
- 2017Word Translation Without Parallel Datacited by 480
- 2017Unsupervised Machine Translation Using Monolingual Corpora Onlycited by 272
- 2013Exploiting Similarities among Languages for Machine Translationcited by 187
- 2014SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models with (Genuine) Similarity Estimationcited by 170
- 2017Unsupervised Neural Machine Translationcited by 148
- 2018A robust self-learning method for fully unsupervised cross-lingual mappings of word embeddingscited by 145
- 2018Phrase-Based & Neural Unsupervised Machine Translationcited by 138
14 more
- 2018On the Limitations of Unsupervised Bilingual Dictionary Inductioncited by 61
- 2020When Does Unsupervised Machine Translation Work?cited by 38
- 2019An Effective Approach to Unsupervised Machine Translationcited by 37
- 2020When and Why is Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation Useless?cited by 34
- 2019Do We Really Need Fully Unsupervised Cross-Lingual Embeddings?cited by 31
- 2019Cross-lingual Alignment vs Joint Training: A Comparative Study and A Simple Unified Frameworkcited by 26
- 2015Morphological Analyzer and Generator for Russian and Ukrainian Languagescited by 25
- 2018Non-Adversarial Unsupervised Word Translationcited by 19
- 2020Unsupervised Bitext Mining and Translation via Self-trained Contextual Embeddingscited by 16
- 2016Learning Crosslingual Word Embeddings without Bilingual Corporacited by 12
- 2019Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation with SMT as Posterior Regularizationcited by 8
- 2019The Source-Target Domain Mismatch Problem in Machine Translationcited by 8
- 2019Extract and Edit: An Alternative to Back-Translation for Unsupervised Neural Machine Translationcited by 7
- 2018Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation Initialized by Unsupervised Statistical Machine Translationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.