The Source-Target Domain Mismatch Problem in Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While we live in an increasingly interconnected world, different places still exhibit strikingly different cultures and many events we experience in our every day life pertain only to the specific place we live in. As a result, people often talk about different things in different parts of the world. In this work we study the effect of local context in machine translation and postulate that particularly in low resource settings this causes the domains of the source and target language to greatly mismatch, as the two languages are often spoken in further apart regions of the world with more distinctive cultural traits and unrelated local events. We first formalize the concept of source-target domain mismatch, propose a metric to quantify it, and provide empirical evidence corroborating our intuition that organic text produced by people speaking very different languages exhibits the most dramatic differences. We conclude with an empirical study of how source-target domain mismatch affects training of machine translation systems for low resource language pairs. In particular, we find that it severely affects back-translation, but the degradation can be alleviated by combining back-translation with self-training and by increasing the relative amount of target side monolingual data.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2021Causal Direction of Data Collection Matters: Implications of Causal and Anticausal Learning for NLPcited by 21
- 2021On the Language Coverage Bias for Neural Machine Translationcited by 12
- 2024Rule-Based, Neural and LLM Back-Translation: Comparative Insights from a Variant of Ladincited by 5
- 2024Cross-lingual Human-Preference Alignment for Neural Machine Translation with Direct Quality Optimizationcited by 5
- 2022Enriching Biomedical Knowledge for Low-resource Language Through Large-Scale Translationcited by 4
- 2022MTet: Multi-domain Translation for English and Vietnamesecited by 4
- 2022Domain Mismatch Doesn't Always Prevent Cross-Lingual Transfer Learningcited by 1
- 2026BYOL: Bring Your Own Language Into LLMscited by 0
- 2026BYOL: Bring Your Own Language Into LLMs15 Jan 2026
- 2024Cross-lingual Human-Preference Alignment for Neural Machine Translation with Direct Quality Optimization26 Sep 2024
- 2024Rule-Based, Neural and LLM Back-Translation: Comparative Insights from a Variant of Ladin11 Jul 2024
- 2022Domain Mismatch Doesn't Always Prevent Cross-Lingual Transfer Learning30 Nov 2022
- 2022MTet: Multi-domain Translation for English and Vietnamese11 Oct 2022
- 2022Enriching Biomedical Knowledge for Low-resource Language Through Large-Scale Translation11 Oct 2022
- 2021Causal Direction of Data Collection Matters: Implications of Causal and Anticausal Learning for NLP7 Oct 2021
- 2021On the Language Coverage Bias for Neural Machine Translation7 Jun 2021