Far3Det: Towards Far-Field 3D Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We focus on the task of far-field 3D detection (Far3Det) of objects beyond a certain distance from an observer, e.g., >50m. Far3Det is particularly important for autonomous vehicles (AVs) operating at highway speeds, which require detections of far-field obstacles to ensure sufficient braking distances. However, contemporary AV benchmarks such as nuScenes underemphasize this problem because they evaluate performance only up to a certain distance (50m). One reason is that obtaining far-field 3D annotations is difficult, particularly for lidar sensors that produce very few point returns for far-away objects. Indeed, we find that almost 50% of far-field objects (beyond 50m) contain zero lidar points. Secondly, current metrics for 3D detection employ a "one-size-fits-all" philosophy, using the same tolerance thresholds for near and far objects, inconsistent with tolerances for both human vision and stereo disparities. Both factors lead to an incomplete analysis of the Far3Det task. For example, while conventional wisdom tells us that high-resolution RGB sensors should be vital for 3D detection of far-away objects, lidar-based methods still rank higher compared to RGB counterparts on the current benchmark leaderboards. As a first step towards a Far3Det benchmark, we develop a method to find well-annotated scenes from the nuScenes dataset and derive a well-annotated far-field validation set. We also propose a Far3Det evaluation protocol and explore various 3D detection methods for Far3Det. Our result convincingly justifies the long-held conventional wisdom that high-resolution RGB improves 3D detection in the far-field. We further propose a simple yet effective method that fuses detections from RGB and lidar detectors based on non-maximum suppression, which remarkably outperforms state-of-the-art 3D detectors in the far-field.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2022.
Builds on
29 of 47 references.
References · 29
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
- 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,451
- 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,715
- 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,492
- 2020Center-based 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 1,144
- 2020Designing Network Design Spacescited by 960
- 2016Multi-View 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Drivingcited by 724
- 2017Frustum PointNets for 3D Object Detection from RGB-D Datacited by 640
- 2018Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 457
- 2019PointPainting: Sequential Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 449
- 2021FCOS3D: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 447
- 2019Class-balanced Grouping and Sampling for Point Cloud 3D Object Detectioncited by 350
17 more
- 2017Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregationcited by 326
- 2020Deep Continuous Fusion for Multi-Sensor 3D Object Detectioncited by 263
- 2019Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Drivingcited by 188
- 2017PointFusion: Deep Sensor Fusion for 3D Bounding Box Estimationcited by 170
- 2021Multimodal Virtual Point 3D Detectioncited by 166
- 2019MVX-Net: Multimodal VoxelNet for 3D Object Detectioncited by 163
- 2020CLOCs: Camera-LiDAR Object Candidates Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 147
- 2019Frustum ConvNet: Sliding Frustums to Aggregate Local Point-Wise Features for Amodal 3D Object Detectioncited by 124
- 2021FusionPainting: Multimodal Fusion with Adaptive Attention for 3D Object Detectioncited by 92
- 2020SSN: Shape Signature Networks for Multi-class Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 74
- 2019What You See is What You Get: Exploiting Visibility for 3D Object Detectioncited by 69
- 2021Multimodal Object Detection via Probabilistic Ensemblingcited by 68
- 2019Sensor Fusion for Joint 3D Object Detection and Semantic Segmentationcited by 48
- 2022Towards Long-Tailed 3D Detectioncited by 40
- 2018Exploit the Connectivity: Multi-Object Tracking with TrackletNetcited by 30
- 2022LET-3D-AP: Longitudinal Error Tolerant 3D Average Precision for Camera-Only 3D Detectioncited by 27
- 2013Qualitative Propagation and Scenario-based Explanation of Probabilistic Reasoningcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023Long-Tailed 3D Detection via Multi-Modal Fusioncited by 10
- 2023Towards Long-Range 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 5
- 2023ReBound: An Open-Source 3D Bounding Box Annotation Tool for Active Learningcited by 4
- 2024Roadside Monocular 3D Detection Prompted by 2D Detectioncited by 2
- 2025DGFusion: Dual-guided Fusion for Robust Multi-Modal 3D Object Detectioncited by 2
- 2025AutoExpert: Automating 3D LiDAR Annotation from Expert-Crafted Guidelinescited by 0
- 2026ATN3D: Density-Aware LiDAR-Radar Early 3D Object Detection Under Extreme Sparsitycited by 0
- 2026ATN3D: Density-Aware LiDAR-Radar Early 3D Object Detection Under Extreme Sparsity8 Jun 2026
- 2025DGFusion: Dual-guided Fusion for Robust Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection13 Nov 2025
- 2025AutoExpert: Automating 3D LiDAR Annotation from Expert-Crafted Guidelines3 Jun 2025
- 2024Roadside Monocular 3D Detection Prompted by 2D Detection1 Apr 2024
- 2023Long-Tailed 3D Detection via Multi-Modal Fusion18 Dec 2023
- 2023Towards Long-Range 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Vehicles7 Oct 2023
- 2023ReBound: An Open-Source 3D Bounding Box Annotation Tool for Active Learning11 Mar 2023