mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Contrastive pretraining for semantic segmentation is robust to noisy positive pairs

arXiv 2211.13756 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2022cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Domain-specific variants of contrastive learning can construct positive pairs from two distinct in-domain images, while traditional methods just augment the same image twice. For example, we can form a positive pair from two satellite images showing the same location at different times. Ideally, this teaches the model to ignore changes caused by seasons, weather conditions or image acquisition artifacts. However, unlike in traditional contrastive methods, this can result in undesired positive pairs, since we form them without human supervision. For example, a positive pair might consist of one image before a disaster and one after. This could teach the model to ignore the differences between intact and damaged buildings, which might be what we want to detect in the downstream task. Similar to false negative pairs, this could impede model performance. Crucially, in this setting only parts of the images differ in relevant ways, while other parts remain similar. Surprisingly, we find that downstream semantic segmentation is either robust to such badly matched pairs or even benefits from them. The experiments are conducted on the remote sensing dataset xBD, and a synthetic segmentation dataset for which we have full control over the pairing conditions. As a result, practitioners can use these domain-specific contrastive methods without having to filter their positive pairs beforehand, or might even be encouraged to purposefully include such pairs in their pretraining dataset.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2022.

Builds on

24 of 33 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  4. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  5. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,859
  6. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  7. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  8. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  9. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  10. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,845
  11. 2020Dense Contrastive Learning for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Trainingcited by 512
  12. 2020Contrastive learning of global and local features for medical image segmentation with limited annotationscited by 309
12 more
  1. 2022Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation by Distilling Feature Correspondencescited by 241
  2. 2021Seasonal Contrast: Unsupervised Pre-Training from Uncurated Remote Sensing Datacited by 215
  3. 2020Geography-Aware Self-Supervised Learningcited by 190
  4. 2020Boosting Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning with False Negative Cancellationcited by 119
  5. 2021Pixel Contrastive-Consistent Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 101
  6. 2020Contrastive Learning for Label-Efficient Semantic Segmentationcited by 93
  7. 2022SSL4EO-S12: A Large-Scale Multi-Modal, Multi-Temporal Dataset for Self-Supervised Learning in Earth Observationcited by 84
  8. 2022A Simple Data Mixing Prior for Improving Self-Supervised Learningcited by 27
  9. 2021Self-supervised pre-training enhances change detection in Sentinel-2 imagerycited by 21
  10. 2021Focus on the Positives: Self-Supervised Learning for Biodiversity Monitoringcited by 16
  11. 2020Self-supervised Pre-training with Hard Examples Improves Visual Representationscited by 12
  12. 2022Towards Efficient and Effective Self-Supervised Learning of Visual Representationscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.