mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PIC-Score: Probabilistic Interpretable Comparison Score for Optimal Matching Confidence in Single- and Multi-Biometric (Face) Recognition

arXiv 2211.12483 ↗First posted 22 Nov 2022cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the context of biometrics, matching confidence refers to the confidence that a given matching decision is correct. Since many biometric systems operate in critical decision-making processes, such as in forensics investigations, accurately and reliably stating the matching confidence becomes of high importance. Previous works on biometric confidence estimation can well differentiate between high and low confidence, but lack interpretability. Therefore, they do not provide accurate probabilistic estimates of the correctness of a decision. In this work, we propose a probabilistic interpretable comparison (PIC) score that accurately reflects the probability that the score originates from samples of the same identity. We prove that the proposed approach provides optimal matching confidence. Contrary to other approaches, it can also optimally combine multiple samples in a joint PIC score which further increases the recognition and confidence estimation performance. In the experiments, the proposed PIC approach is compared against all biometric confidence estimation methods available on four publicly available databases and five state-of-the-art face recognition systems. The results demonstrate that PIC has a significantly more accurate probabilistic interpretation than similar approaches and is highly effective for multi-biometric recognition. The code is publicly-available.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2022.

Builds on

11 of 31 references.

References · 11

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  2. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
  3. 2021MagFace: A Universal Representation for Face Recognition and Quality Assessmentcited by 334
  4. 2018Deep Face Recognition: A Surveycited by 276
  5. 2019Probabilistic Face Embeddingscited by 173
  6. 2020SER-FIQ: Unsupervised Estimation of Face Image Quality Based on Stochastic Embedding Robustnesscited by 112
  7. 2020Post-Comparison Mitigation of Demographic Bias in Face Recognition Using Fair Score Normalizationcited by 28
  8. 2021QMagFace: Simple and Accurate Quality-Aware Face Recognitioncited by 25
  9. 2019A Comprehensive Overview of Biometric Fusioncited by 18
  10. 2022Causality-Inspired Taxonomy for Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 9
  11. 2022Stating Comparison Score Uncertainty and Verification Decision Confidence Towards Transparent Face Recognitioncited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

4 papers.