Unveiling the Tapestry: the Interplay of Generalization and Forgetting in Continual Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In AI, generalization refers to a model's ability to perform well on out-of-distribution data related to the given task, beyond the data it was trained on. For an AI agent to excel, it must also possess the continual learning capability, whereby an agent incrementally learns to perform a sequence of tasks without forgetting the previously acquired knowledge to solve the old tasks. Intuitively, generalization within a task allows the model to learn underlying features that can readily be applied to novel tasks, facilitating quicker learning and enhanced performance in subsequent tasks within a continual learning framework. Conversely, continual learning methods often include mechanisms to mitigate catastrophic forgetting, ensuring that knowledge from earlier tasks is retained. This preservation of knowledge over tasks plays a role in enhancing generalization for the ongoing task at hand. Despite the intuitive appeal of the interplay of both abilities, existing literature on continual learning and generalization has proceeded separately. In the preliminary effort to promote studies that bridge both fields, we first present empirical evidence showing that each of these fields has a mutually positive effect on the other. Next, building upon this finding, we introduce a simple and effective technique known as Shape-Texture Consistency Regularization (STCR), which caters to continual learning. STCR learns both shape and texture representations for each task, consequently enhancing generalization and thereby mitigating forgetting. Remarkably, extensive experiments validate that our STCR, can be seamlessly integrated with existing continual learning methods, including replay-free approaches. Its performance surpasses these continual learning methods in isolation or when combined with established generalization techniques by a large margin.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2022.
Builds on
58 of 95 references.
References · 58
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
- 2017Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-time with Adaptive Instance Normalizationcited by 2,010
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
- 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,628
38 more
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
- 2017Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replaycited by 1,158
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,130
- 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,105
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
- 2019Large Scale Incremental Learningcited by 732
- 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 730
- 2013An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networkscited by 722
- 2019Three scenarios for continual learningcited by 614
- 2018End-to-End Incremental Learningcited by 597
- 2018Learning to Learn without Forgetting by Maximizing Transfer and Minimizing Interferencecited by 521
- 2018Generalizing to Unseen Domains via Adversarial Data Augmentationcited by 451
- 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 443
- 2016Expert Gate: Lifelong Learning with a Network of Expertscited by 372
- 2021DER: Dynamically Expandable Representation for Class Incremental Learningcited by 355
- 2021DyTox: Transformers for Continual Learning with DYnamic TOken eXpansioncited by 291
- 2020Mnemonics Training: Multi-Class Incremental Learning without Forgettingcited by 221
- 2019Compacting, Picking and Growing for Unforgetting Continual Learningcited by 207
- 2019Meta-Learning Representations for Continual Learningcited by 189
- 2022On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious Correlationscited by 145
- 2018Avatar-Net: Multi-scale Zero-shot Style Transfer by Feature Decorationcited by 115
- 2018Don't forget, there is more than forgetting: new metrics for Continual Learningcited by 115
- 2021Salient ImageNet: How to discover spurious features in Deep Learning?cited by 114
- 2022Class-Incremental Learning by Knowledge Distillation with Adaptive Feature Consolidationcited by 113
- 2020Generative Feature Replay For Class-Incremental Learningcited by 109
- 2021Are Convolutional Neural Networks or Transformers more like human vision?cited by 109
- 2019Improving Robustness Without Sacrificing Accuracy with Patch Gaussian Augmentationcited by 105
- 2020Shape-Texture Debiased Neural Network Trainingcited by 76
- 2021Improved OOD Generalization via Adversarial Training and Pre-trainingcited by 66
- 2021Examining and Combating Spurious Features under Distribution Shiftcited by 65
- 2017Multi-style Generative Network for Real-time Transfercited by 61
- 2022Beyond Not-Forgetting: Continual Learning with Backward Knowledge Transfercited by 59
- 2020Informative Dropout for Robust Representation Learning: A Shape-bias Perspectivecited by 57
- 2021Essentials for Class Incremental Learningcited by 57
- 2020Removing Spurious Features can Hurt Accuracy and Affect Groups Disproportionatelycited by 52
- 2021Shape or Texture: Understanding Discriminative Features in CNNscited by 52
50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.