Feature Weaken: Vicinal Data Augmentation for Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning usually relies on training large-scale data samples to achieve better performance. However, over-fitting based on training data always remains a problem. Scholars have proposed various strategies, such as feature dropping and feature mixing, to improve the generalization continuously. For the same purpose, we subversively propose a novel training method, Feature Weaken, which can be regarded as a data augmentation method. Feature Weaken constructs the vicinal data distribution with the same cosine similarity for model training by weakening features of the original samples. In especially, Feature Weaken changes the spatial distribution of samples, adjusts sample boundaries, and reduces the gradient optimization value of back-propagation. This work can not only improve the classification performance and generalization of the model, but also stabilize the model training and accelerate the model convergence. We conduct extensive experiments on classical deep convolution neural models with five common image classification datasets and the Bert model with four common text classification datasets. Compared with the classical models or the generalization improvement methods, such as Dropout, Mixup, Cutout, and CutMix, Feature Weaken shows good compatibility and performance. We also use adversarial samples to perform the robustness experiments, and the results show that Feature Weaken is effective in improving the robustness of the model.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2022.
Builds on
47 of 66 references.
References · 47
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
35 more
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
- 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
- 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,514
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
- 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 800
- 2018How Does Batch Normalization Help Optimization?cited by 355
- 2018DropBlock: A regularization method for convolutional networkscited by 261
- 2020Puzzle Mix: Exploiting Saliency and Local Statistics for Optimal Mixupcited by 260
- 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 193
- 2020MixText: Linguistically-Informed Interpolation of Hidden Space for Semi-Supervised Text Classificationcited by 186
- 2018MixUp as Locally Linear Out-Of-Manifold Regularizationcited by 158
- 2018Understanding Batch Normalizationcited by 157
- 2018Is Robustness the Cost of Accuracy? -- A Comprehensive Study on the Robustness of 18 Deep Image Classification Modelscited by 135
- 2019Augmenting Data with Mixup for Sentence Classification: An Empirical Studycited by 125
- 2019Attention-based Dropout Layer for Weakly Supervised Object Localizationcited by 125
- 2020GridMask Data Augmentationcited by 123
- 2018Three Mechanisms of Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 112
- 2021Understanding and Improving Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
- 2020Delving Deep into Label Smoothingcited by 94
- 2021TransMix: Attend to Mix for Vision Transformerscited by 79
- 2020KeepAugment: A Simple Information-Preserving Data Augmentation Approachcited by 52
- 2020Early Stopping in Deep Networks: Double Descent and How to Eliminate itcited by 40
- 2021SSMix: Saliency-Based Span Mixup for Text Classificationcited by 39
- 2018Hide-and-Seek: A Data Augmentation Technique for Weakly-Supervised Localization and Beyondcited by 36
- 2021AutoDropout: Learning Dropout Patterns to Regularize Deep Networkscited by 35
- 2021Substructure Substitution: Structured Data Augmentation for NLPcited by 25
- 2020Label Confusion Learning to Enhance Text Classification Modelscited by 16
- 2022TreeMix: Compositional Constituency-based Data Augmentation for Natural Language Understandingcited by 15
- 2018Guided Dropoutcited by 14
- 2020PatchUp: A Feature-Space Block-Level Regularization Technique for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 12
- 2021ALP: Data Augmentation using Lexicalized PCFGs for Few-Shot Text Classificationcited by 10
- 2021Adaptive Warden Strategy for Countering Network Covert Storage Channelscited by 6
- 2021What Have Been Learned & What Should Be Learned? An Empirical Study of How to Selectively Augment Text for Classificationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.